inbureИзвестия вузов. Инвестиции. Строительство. НедвижимостьIzvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost2227-29172500-154XIrkutsk National Research Technical University10.21285/2227-2917-2023-1-168-177inbure-59Research ArticleАРХИТЕКТУРА. ДИЗАЙНARCHITECTURE. DESIGNАнализ зарубежной практики архитектурно-экологического формирования современных университетских кампусовAn analysis of foreign practice in the architectural and ecological formation of contemporary university campuseshttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4552-5962ЧистяковаА. В.ChistiakovaA. V.

Anna V. Chistiakova - Postgraduate Student.

76 Lenina St., Chelyabinsk 454080

anny-chi@mail.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9405-2079ШабиевС. Г.ShabievS. G.

Шабиев Салават Галиевич - доктор архитектуры, профессор, заведующий кафедрой архитектуры.

454080, Челябинск, пр-т Ленина, 76

Salavat G. Shabiev - Doctor of Architecture, Professor, Head of the Department of Architecture.

76 Lenina St., Chelyabinsk 454080

shabievsg@susu.ruЮжно-Уральский государственный университет (Национальный исследовательский университет)РоссияSouth Ural State University (National Research University)Russian Federation202308112023131168177Copyright © Чистякова А.В., Шабиев С.Г., 20232023Чистякова А.В., Шабиев С.Г.Chistiakova A.V., Shabiev S.G.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://inbure.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/59

Целью статьи является проведение комплексного исследования прогрессивного зарубежного опыта реализации современных университетских кампусов в аспекте их архитектурно-экологического формирования. В соответствии с поставленной целью используется системный подход к изучению информационных материалов, включая нормативную документацию. С. Г. Шабиевым проведено натурное обследование существующих кампусов университетов в Австралии, Канаде, Китае и других странах, а также сравнительный анализ эффективности реализованных архитектурно-экологических приемов. Проанализированы градостроительные условия территории, планировочные ограничения, климатические характеристики территории рассматриваемых кампусов. Также выявлены архитектурно-экологические особенности каждого исследуемого объекта, таких, как эксплуатируемая инверсионная кровля, низкоэмиссионное остекление фасадов, фотогальванические элементы, а также ландшафтная организация пространства, включающая вертикальные или внутренние сады, благоприятствующие микроклимату кампусов. Наиболее эффективные приемы архитектурно-экологического формирования университетских кампусов составлены в единую методологическую структуру, которая может быть использована при разработке концепций подобных объектов. Изучен современный зарубежный опыт проектирования и реализации университетских кампусов. Получена методологическая структура архитектурно-экологического формирования. Определена возможность использования результатов исследования в разработке проекта архитектурной концепции международного кампуса Южно-Уральского государственного университета в г. Челябинске.

In this work, we investigate best foreign practices in establishing contemporary university campuses in terms of their architectural and environmental formation. For this purpose, we adopted a systematic approach to the study of information resources, including regulatory documentation. S.G. Shabiev conducted a field survey of existing university campuses in Australia, Canada, China and other countries, as well as a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of the implemented architectural and environmental techniques. The study analyzed the campuses in terms of planning restrictions, urban planning conditions and climatic characteristics. In addition, the architectural and environmental features of each site under study were identified: inverted roofs in operation, low emissivity facade glazing, photocells, as well as landscape systems with microclimate-friendly vertical or inner gardens. The most effective techniques for architectural and ecological formation of university campuses were compiled into a coherent methodological framework that can be used when developing concepts for such facilities. Best foreign practices in the design and implementation of contemporary university campuses were studied. The methodological framework for architectural and environmental formation was obtained. We also explored the potential for using the obtained results in developing an architectural concept design for the international campus of South Ural State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia.

архитектурно-экологическое проектирование«зеленое» строительствоинновационное развитиеуниверситетские кампусыг. Челябинскarchitectural and ecological designʺgreenʺ buildinginnovative developmentuniversity campusesChelyabinskReferencesShabiev S.G. South Ural State University Campus: Architectural Development Concept in Accordanse with the International Standarts // IOP Conferense Series: Materials Science and Engineering: International Conference on Construction, Architecture and Technosphere Safety (Chelyabinsk, 21–22 September 2017). 2017. Vol. 262. № 012131. 6 p. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757899X/262/1/012131.Shabiev S.G. South Ural State University Campus: Architectural Development Concept in Accordanse with the International Standarts. IOP Conferense Series: Materials Science and Engineering: International Conference on Construction, Architecture and Technosphere Safety. 21–22 September 2017, Chelyabinsk. 2017. Vol. 262. № 012131. 6 p. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/262/1/012131.Захарова Т.В. Эффективность экологической политики: от решения глобальных проблем до формирования университетских кампусов // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 47. С. 179–188. https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/47/19.Zakharova T.V. The effectiveness of environmental policy: from solving global problems to establishing university campuses. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Politologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. 2019;47:179-188. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/1998863X/47/19.Пучков М.В. Стратегии развития урбанизированных территорий: кампусные модели как средство управления региональным развитием // Академический вестник УралНИИПроект РААСН. 2021. № 1. С. 30–34.Puchkov M.V. Strategies for the development of urbanized territories: campus models as a means of managing regional development. Akademicheskij vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2021;1:30-34. (In Russ.).Shabiev S.G. The Ecological City Planning Aspects of the South Ural State University Main Building Complex Reconstruction // Procedia Engineering. 2016. Vol. 150. P. 1978–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.201.Shabiev S.G. The Ecological City Planning Aspects of the South Ural State University Main Building Complex Reconstruction. Procedia Engineering. 2016;150:1978-1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.201.Павлова В.А., Голошубин В.С. Экологические технологии в проектировании современных университетских кампусов // Архитектура и современные информационные технологии. 2017. № 1 (38). С. 371–382.Pavlova V.A., Goloshubin V.S. Environmental technologies in design of modern university campuses. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii = Architecture and modern information technologies. 2017;1:371-385. (In Russ.).Morrow K. Rio+20, the Green Economy and Reorienting Sustainable Development // Environmental Law Review. 2012. Vol. 14. P. 279–297. https://doi.org/10.1350/enlr.2012.14.4.166.Morrow K. Rio+20, the Green Economy and Reorienting Sustainable Development. Environmental Law Review. 2012;14:279-297. https://doi.org/10.1350/enlr.2012.14.4.166.Shafiullah D.S., Vergara P.P., Haque A.N.M.M., Nguyen P.H., Pemen A.J.M. Gaussian Mixture Based Uncertainty Modeling to Optimize Energy Management of Heterogeneous Building Neighborhoods: A Case Study of a Dutch University Medical Campus // Energy and Buildings. 2020. Vol. 224. P. 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110150.Shafiullah D.S., Vergara P.P., Haque A.N.M.M., Nguyen P.H., Pemen A.J.M. Gaussian Mixture Based Uncertainty Modeling to Optimize Energy Management of Heterogeneous Building Neighborhoods: A Case Study of a Dutch University Medical Campus. Energy and Buildings. 2020. Vol. 224. P. 26–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110150.Jiajia Liu, Yunpeng Zhao, Xingfeng Si, Gang Feng, Ferry Slik, Jian Zhang. University campuses as valuable resources for urban biodiversity research and conservation // Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2021. Vol. 64. P. 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127255.Jiajia Liu, Yunpeng Zhao, Xingfeng Si, Gang Feng, Ferry Slik, Jian Zhang. University campuses as valuable resources for urban biodiversity research and conservation. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2021;64:256-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127255.Yong Geng, Kebin Liu, Bing Xue, Tsuyoshi Fujita. Creating a "green university" in China: a case of Shenyang University // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019. Vol. 61. P. 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.013.Yong Geng, Kebin Liu, Bing Xue, Tsuyoshi Fujita. Creating a "green university" in China: a case of Shenyang University. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2019;61:13-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.013.Xinpei Jiang, Bao Zheng, Haifeng Wang. The Research on Eco-campus Evaluation Index System and Weight // Wseas Transactions on Environment and Developvent. 2010. Vol. 6. Iss. 12. P. 793–803.Xinpei Jiang, Bao Zheng, Haifeng Wang. The Research on Eco-campus Evaluation Index System and Weight. Wseas Transactions on Environment and Developvent. 2010;6(12):793-803.Celniker Ch., Chen Sh., Meier A., Levinson R. Targeting buildings for energy-saving cool-wall retrofits: a case study at the University of California, Davis // Energy and Buildings. 2021. Vol. 249. P. 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111014.Celniker Ch., Chen Sh., Meier A., Levinson R. Targeting buildings for energy-saving cool-wall retrofits: a case study at the University of California, Davis. Energy and Buildings. 2021;249:167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111014.Savely S.M., Carson A.I., Delclos G.L. An environmental management system implementation model for U.S. colleges and universities // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007. № 15 (7). P. 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.013.Savely S.M., Carson A.I., Delclos G.L. An environmental management system implementation model for U.S. colleges and universities. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2007;15(7):660-670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.01.013.Подопригора Ю.В., Захарова Т.В., Кроза Д. Современные университетские кампусы с использованием зеленых инноваций: зарубежный и российский опыт // Естественно-гуманитарные исследования. 2020. № 28 (2). С. 220–226. https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-4788-2020-10105.Podoprigora Y.V., Zaharova T.V., Crozat D. Modern university campuss using green innovations: foreign and Russian experience. 2020;28(2):220-226. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2309-4788-2020-10105.Низамутдинова З.Ф. Разработка модели архитектурно-ландшафтного каркаса университетского кампуса // Вестник Иркутского государственного технического университета. 2015. № 10 (105). С. 144–150.Nizamutdinova Z.F. Developing a university campus architectural and landscape framework model. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of Irkutsk state technical university. 2015;10:144-150. (In Russ.).Dahle M., Neumayer E. Overcoming barriers to campus greening: a survey among higher educational institutions in London, UK // International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2021. Vol. 2. № 2. P. 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370110388363.Dahle M., Neumayer E. Overcoming barriers to campus greening: a survey among higher educational institutions in London, UK. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. 2021;2(2):139-160. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370110388363.Елисеев А.М., Подопригора Ю.В., Захарова Т.В. Кампусы будущего в университетских городах России и Франции в условиях цифровой экономики, инноваций и безбарьерной среды // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Экономика. 2020. № 49. С. 225–235. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/49/16.Eliseev A.M., Podoprigora Yu.V., Zakharova T.V. Campuses of the future in university cities of Russia and France in the conditions of digital economy, innovation and barrier-free environment. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika = Tomsk State University Journal of Economics. 2020;49:225-235. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/49/16.Adedeji P.A., Akinlabi S., Madushele N. Powering the future university campuses: a mini-review of feasible sources // Procedia Manufacturing. 2019. Vol. 35. P. 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.003.Adedeji P.A., Akinlabi S., Madushele N. Powering the future university campuses: a mini-review of fea-sible sources. Procedia Manufacturing. 2019;35:3-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.05.003.Попов А.В., Сырова О.И. Вопросы архитектурно-градостроительной типологии кампусов вузов // Инновации и инвестиции. 2021. № 1. С. 157–161.Popov A.V., Syrova O.I. Issues of architectural and urban typology of university campuses. Innovatsii i investitsii. 2021;1:157-161. (In Russ.).Viebahn P. An environmental management model for universities: from environmental guidelines to staff involvement // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2002. № 10. P. 3–12.Viebahn P. An environmental management model for universities: from environmental guidelines to staff involvement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2002;10:3-12.Vyatkin G.P., Shabiev S.G. Reconstruction of South Ural State University Buildings and Structures. Shanghai, 2016. 99 p.Vyatkin G.P., Shabiev S.G. Reconstruction of South Ural State University Buildings and Structures. Shanghai; 2016. 99 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.