Managing construction processes in emergency response to floods
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-3-422-431
Abstract
As an important global concern, climate change shifted the balance of natural systems, causing temperature anomalies, change in precipitation, increase in the number of hurricanes and earthquakes, drought and floods, overall contributing to an increase in the number of natural disasters. Floods are one of the most common natural phenomena that endanger people and construction sites and cause significant losses across the country. This paper presents a concept for managing the construction processes in emergency response to the consequences caused by floods in order to minimise damage and ensure the fastest and highest quality restoration work. The resource and process constituents in emergency response were analysed, as well as the level of damage and consequences of floods. This research allowed a concept for managing the construction processes to be developed based on the principles of target focusing. According to this concept, a technology of prefabricated large-panel housing meets the basic requirements for building structures and materials for the construction in areas prone to natural disasters caused by floods.
About the Authors
O. A. Bezrukikh
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Olga A. Bezrukikh, Postgraduate student, Assistant of the Department of Real Estate Expertise and Management
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664074
M. V. Matveeva
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maria V. Matveeva, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor of the Department of Real Estate Expertise and Management
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664074
References
1. Hoes O, Schuurmans W. Flood standards or risk analyzes for polder management in the Netherlands. Irrig. Drain. 2006;55:113-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.249.
2. Avakyan AB, Istomina MN. Natural and anthropogenic causes of floods. Osnovy bezopasnosti zhiznedeyatel'nosti. 2001;9:22-27. (In Russ.).
3. Rusman B, Istijono B, Ophyandri T, Junaidi A. Social, Economic and Environmental Perspectives of Flood Assessment on Delta Lowland. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET). 2017;8:966-978.
4. Khamutova MV, Kushnikov VA. Minimization of flood consequences based on the system dynamics model. Matematicheskiye metody v tekhnike i tekhnologiyakh. 2017;9:14-17. (In Russ.).
5. Costabile P, Costanzo C, De Lorenzo G, Macchione F. Is local flood hazard assessment in urban areas significantly influenced by the physical complexity of the hydrodynamic inundation model? Journal of Hydrology. 2020;580:124231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124231.
6. Rosenzweig BR, McPhillips L, Chang H, Cheng C, Welty C, Matsler M, et al. Pluvial flood risk and opportunities for resilience. WIREs Water. 2018;5:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1302.
7. Sokolov AV, Shatskikh OV. Analysis of the experience of building coastal fortifications on the territory of the Chita and Amur regions. Vodnyye resursy i vodopol'zovaniye. 2007;3:77-80. (In Russ.).
8. Economov IS. Modern methods of building architectural objects on the water. Trudy MARKHI: materialy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (510th April, 2010). Moscow: MARKHI; 2010. p. 238-244. (In Russ.).
9. Ponyavina NA, Dobrosocki MG, Zolotukhin SN, Potekhin IA. Potential of the decreasing harmful influence of construction industry by reuse of building materials. Stroitel'stvo i nedvizhimost. 2019;1(4):19-25. (In Russ.).
10. Dmitrenko EA, Granina TO. Innovative constructive solutions of quickbuilt buildings made from prefabricated reinforced concrete panels. Vestnik Donbasskoy natsional'noy akademii stroitel'stva i arkhitektury. 2017;4:108-115. (In Russ.).
11. Grebnev YaV, Yarovoy AV. Control and prediction of floods on the territory of the Krasnoyarsk kray through the use of neural network algorithms. Sibirskiy pozharnospasatel'nyy vestnik = Siberian Fire and Rescue Bulletin. 2018;3(10):13-16. (In Russ.).
12. Morrison A, Westbrook CJ, Noble BF. A review of the flood risk management governance and resilience literature. J. Flood Risk Management. 2018;11:291-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12315.
13. Basov AV. Technical regulation and standardization in construction. Zhilishchnoye stroitel'stvo = Housing construction. 2019;1-2: 3-7. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31659/00444472-2019-1-2-3-7.
14. Kovalenko LS, Shalikovsky AV, Shakhov IS. The concept of solving the problem of floods. Voda Rossii: Ekonomiko-pravovoye upravleniye vodopol'zovaniyem. 2000. p. 39-50. (In Russ.).
15. Kudryashova AM. The rationale for the relevance of construction of objects of engineering protection from the negative impact of water. World science: Problems and innovations: collection of articles by the winners of the VI International Scientific and Practical Conference: in 2 p. (Penza, 25th December 2016). 2016. p. 17-20. (In Russ.).
16. Khamutova M, Rezchikov A, Kushnikov V. Algorithms for the Management of Liquidation Process of Floods Consequences. Recent Research in Control Engineering and Decision Making. 2019;199:540-551. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12072-6_44.
17. Heinzlef C, Serre D. Urban resilience: From a limited urban engineering vision to a more global comprehensive and long‐term implementation. Water Security. 2020;11:100075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2020.100075.
18. Shembakov VA. Innovation industrial technology of precast-monolithic frame developed by GC “Rekon-SMK” and used 20 years at the RF market. Zhilishchnoye stroitel'stvo = Housing construction. 2019;3:33-38. https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-4472-2019-3-33-38. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Bezrukikh O.A., Matveeva M.V. Managing construction processes in emergency response to floods. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2021;11(3):422-431. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-3-422-431
Views:
115
Email this article 