Garage amnesty and/or integrated territorial development?
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2022-3-420-429
Abstract
This study continues the author's article series aimed at examining the territory of garage cooperatives (GCs) in Irkutsk as prospective development areas and reserves of urban lands. The “garage amnesty” law accepted by the State Duma of the Russian Federation provides the citizens with the possibility to legalise their garages and land plots, which makes the integrated development of GCs highly specific. The study analyses territories of the most valuable landscapes in the southern part of the Sverdlovsk Okrug occupied with GCs, which impede their integrated development. An empirical research method was used, including a description, comparison by districts and calculation of actual GC areas formed by 2021 in Irkutsk. An analysis of the GC location was carried out with the provision of absolute and relative indicators. In the process of the study, a strategy for improving the quality of the living environment by transforming the areas of garage cooperatives into attractive recreational zones with highly effective multifunctional facilities was developed. This strategy proposes a compact storage of cars, their maintenance, arrangement of individual vegetable storages and organisation of other public functions at the places of GC location with the transformation of the latter into a comfortable environment both for owners of personal vehicles and neighbourhood residents. GC territories can be transformed into potential sites of city development. The paper contains schemes and research results obtained in the framework of the final qualification work in the "Architecture" speciality of student M.V. Malkina (2021) under the guidance of the author of the present article at the Irkutsk National Research Technical University (INRTU).
About the Author
I. E. DruzhininaRussian Federation
Inna E. Druzhinina - Professor, Professor of the Department of Architectural Design, Irkutsk National Research Technical University.
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664074
Competing Interests:
None
References
1. Rasputin V. Smart Growth and Development of the City. Project Baikal. 2016;13(47-48):32-33. https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.47-48.993. (In Russ.).
2. Albagul A, Alsharef K, Saad M, Abujeela Y. Design and Fabrication of an Automated Multilevel Car Parking System. Manufacturing Engineering, Automatic Control and Robotics. 2013. p. 173-178. Available from: https://www.re-searchgate.net/publication/277775104_Design_and_Fabrication_of_an_Automated_Multi-level_Car_Parking_System [Accessed 10th April 2022].
3. Rathi MK, Patel DV. Different types of Parking Spaces and Multiple Level Car Parking. Civil Engineering Portal. 2013. Available from: https://www.engineeringcivil.com/different-types-of-parking-spaces-and-multiple-level-car-park-ing.html [Accessed 11th April 2022].
4. Parmar J, Das P, Dave SM. Study on demand and characteristics of parking system in urban areas: A review. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition). 2020;7(1): 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2019.09.003.
5. Manukhina L. Analysis of modern approaches to the organization of parking areas in major cities. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018;193:01037. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819301037.
6. Kolesova ON, Gusarova EA. Problem aspects of the garage question in Russian Federation. Mezhdunarodnyi zhurnal gumanitarnykh i estestvennykh nauk = International journal of humanities and natural sciences. 2019;12-4(39): 62-64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2500-1000-2019-11987.
7. Silina TB. Problems of Legal Regulation of Activity Garage-Building Cooperatives. Yuridicheskaya nauka: istoriya i sovremennost' = Legal science: history and the presence. 2016;2:79-82. (In Russ.).
8. Petrushkin VA. About Certain Problems of Legal Qualification of Land Plots' Users Status Granted to Garage Construction Cooperatives on the Right of Permanent (Indefinite) Usage. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi yuridicheskoi akademii. 2020;3(134):130-136. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/2227-7315-2020-10077.
9. Tykanova EV. The City as a Territory of Inequality: Contestation of Garage Spots Demolition in St. Petersburg. Peterburgskaya sotsiologiya segodnya = St. Petersburg Sociology Today. 2017;8: 54-72. (In Russ.).
10. Pogosyan ES, Kavalaglio AV. Principles of landscape organization of degraded territories of garages on the example of the city of Nizhny Novgorod. Vestnik nauki. 2019;5(9):22-26. (In Russ.).
11. Nefedov VA. Landscape design and environmental sustainability. Saint-Petersburg: Poligraphist; 2002. 295 p. (In Russ.).
12. Nefedov VA. Urban landscaping. Saint-Petersburg: Lubavitch; 2020. 320 p. (In Russ.).
13. Grub H. Greenery between the houses. Munich: Bavarian Mortgage and Bill Ban, Joint Stock Company; 1990. 200 p. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Druzhinina I.E. Garage amnesty and/or integrated territorial development? Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2022;12(3):420-429. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2022-3-420-429