Risk assessment of design faults
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2024-4-708-718
EDN: JDRMYF
Abstract
This paper focuses on the risk assessment of design faults which can be made in design documentation thus leading to significant damage and reduced construction efficiency. The data on statistics of the remarks made at the stage of design expertise are given. The steps of risk management at different stages of design, as well as types of risks are described. A method is proposed to analyze the risks of design faults involving the analysis of the types, consequences, and criticality of failures. In this method, the frequency of faults, their significance, and the probability of their detection are scored. Additionally, the probability of a fault can be pre-determined by a sample of specific types of objects or accepted by expert judgment. By multiplying the scores, the value of the complex (priority) risk of design fault is found and the risk level is assigned. For this purpose, the complex risk is compared with the boundary value of the priority risk number (PRN) and then classified as high, medium, or low. The risk level is determined by estimates of the frequency and significance of design faults. According to the risk level the measures significant for design quality management can be assigned. Criteria for assigning scores as well as management measures for each level of complex risk are proposed. Risk assessment for the main high-risk design faults has been performed. As a result, the method can be used to form a list of critical design faults, to justify control and preventive measures, as well as optimize the design process for increasing the quality of projects.
About the Authors
A. Kh. Baiburin
South Ural State University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Albert Kh. Baiburin, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Advisor to the RAACS, Professor of the Department of Building Technologies and Structural Engineering
AuthorID: 266980
76 Lenin Ave., Chelyabinsk 454080
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
A. Yu. Samarin
Apriori-Stroy LLC
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Alexandr Yu. Samarin, General Director
224 Rossiyskaya St., Chelyabinsk 454091
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.
References
1. Dobromyslov A.N. Diagnostics of Damage to Buildings and Engineering Structures. Moscow: Association of Construction Universities, 2006. 256 p. (In Russ.).
2. Dobromyslov A.N. Errors in The Design of Building Structures. Moscow: Association of Construction Universities, 2007. 184 p. (In Russ.).
3. Perel'muter A.V. Selected Problems of Reliability and Safety of Building Structures. Moscow: Association of Construction Universities, 2007. 255 p. (In Russ.). EDN: QNMXBJ.
4. Akristiniy V.A., Zharkov D.A. Analysis of Implemented Methods of Construction and Technical Expertise of Project Documentation. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology Integral. 2019;4-2:1-16. (In Russ.). EDN: XKLZBS.
5. Samofalov M., Papinigis V. Quality of Design Project Documentation from The Point of View of Technical Expertise in Lithuania. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2010;2(12):4-11. (In Russ.). EDN: LRPZYQ.
6. Perel'muter A.V., Slivker V.I. Improving The Quality of Design Justifications for Projects. Byulleten' stroitel'noi tekhniki. 2005;10:59-62. (In Russ.).
7. Klymanov S.G. Costly Design Errors. Aktual'nye problemy voenno-nauchnykh issledovanii. 2022;4(24):110-117. (In Russ.). EDN: UZJCTP.
8. Iqbal S., Choudhry R.M., Holschemacher K., Ali A., Tamošaitienė J. Risk Management in Construction Projects. Technological and Economic Development of Economy 2015;21(1):65-78. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.994582.
9. Kozlov M.L. Children’s Educational Institutions: Problems and Design Errors. Akademicheskii vestnik Ural-NIIproekt RAASN. 2011;3:83-88. (In Russ.). EDN: OFFSBL.
10. Smirnova O.V., Avdeed K.V., Polyansky N.A. General Principles of Risk Assessment in The Design of Buildings and Structures. Engineering Journal of Don. 2023;8(104):508-519. (In Russ.). EDN: TVFBJQ.
11. Samarin A.Yu., Baiburin A.Kh. Modular Approach to Assessment of the Quality of Project Organizations. Bulletin of the South Ural State University. Ser. Construction Engineering and Architecture. 2022;22(2):52-60. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14529/build220207. EDN: EZODWP.
12. Melnikov M.S. Risks of Projects for The Implementation of Design Works and Engineering Surveys in The Construction Sector. Vestnik Altaiskoi akademii ekonomiki i prava. 2022;12-1:109-113. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17513/vaael.2624. EDN: IPGHJD.
13. Telnykh V.G., Shevchenko L.V. Management of Design Risks in Construction. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. 2011;7(8):219-222. (In Russ.). EDN: NYIJVJ.
14. Alferov V.I., Barkalov S.A., Burkov V.N., Kurochka P.N., Khorokhordina N.V., Shipilov V.N. Applied Problems of Construction Project Management. Voronezh: Voronezh State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2008. 785 p. (In Russ.). EDN: UGNXUR.
15. Asau V.V., Lokot' D.I., Pesotskaya E.V., Sitdikov S.A. Formation of Risk Management Mechanisms for Investment and Construction Projects. Saint Petersburg: Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering, 2016. 170 p. (In Russ.).
16. Rachmadhani M.M., Immawan T., Mansur A., Choi W. Risk Management Framework Design Based on ISO 31000 and SCOR Model. Spektrum Industri. 2023;21(1):41-51. https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v21i1.93.
17. Mingke Zhou, Yuegang Tang, Huai Jin, Bo Zhang, Xuewen Sang A BIM-Based Identification and Classification Method of Environmental Risks in The Design of Beijing Subway. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2021;27(7):500-514. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.15602.
18. Rodrigues F., Antunes F., Matos R. Safety Plugins for Risks Prevention Through Design Resourcing BIM. Construction Innovation. 2021;21(2):244-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-12-2019-0147.
19. Politi V. Risk Management at The Stage of Design of High-Rise Construction Facilities. E3S Web of Conferences. 2018;33:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183303042.
20. Seoung-Wook Whang, Donyavi S., Flanagan R., Sangyong Kim Contractor-Led Design Risk Management in International Large Project: Korean Contractor’s Perspective. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2023;22(3):1387-1398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2085718.
21. Ping Zhong, Hang Yin, Yuanfu Li Analysis and Design of the Project Risk Management System Based on the Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm. Journal of Control Science and Engineering. 2022;5:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9328038.
Review
For citations:
Baiburin A.Kh., Samarin A.Yu. Risk assessment of design faults. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2024;14(4):708-718. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2024-4-708-718. EDN: JDRMYF
Views:
105
Email this article 