Optimal organization of sites for solid municipal waste management: urban morphology and spatial analysis, multi-factor evaluation
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2025-2-347-358
EDN: CGXVOI
Abstract
A generalized approach to organization of sites for solid municipal waste management is proposed. The choice of such a site requires an interdisciplinary research approach to the design of the area to be developed. Our main research methods included: an analysis of urban morphology for finding solutions for real estate development; a spatial analysis for combinability of approaches and techniques in terms of geography; a simulation method for simulating connections between functional subsystems; a factor productivity analysis when evaluating a systematic approach to defining an optimal organization of an area for solid municipal waste management; a hierarchy analysis for constructing a hierarchical structure of criteria and factors influencing decision-making. This work highlighted required branch regulations on requirements for environment preservation, urban development, and determination of the legal status of areas for constructing solid municipal waste management facilities. When studying these regulations, four groups of factors influencing the design and construction of solid municipal waste management facility were determined, i.e., transport accessibility, ecological quality, infrastructure provision, and urban attractiveness. Principles of evaluating each of this group were presented. The integrated index of the area value was calculated. Based on the hierarchy analysis, a model of multi-factor analysis of organization of sites for solid municipal waste management is presented.
About the Author
E. V. Balabenko
Donbas National Academy of Civil Engineering and Architecture
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Elena V. Balabenko, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor of the Department Construction Organization Management
Author ID: 586094
2 Derzhavina St., Makeevka 286123, Donetsk People's Republic
Competing Interests:
The author declares no conflict of interests.
References
1. Karunarathne A. Optimal and Safe Site Selection for The Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Management: Using GIS and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Journal of Geography. 2017;63-64:27-48.
2. Gunaruwan T.L., Gunasekara W.N. Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Sri Lanka: A Comparative Appraisal of the Economics of Composting. NSBM Journal of Management. 2016;2(1):27-45. https://doi.org/10.4038/nsbmjm.v2i1.19.
3. Alexandridi O.A. The Waste Problem in Russia: Statistics, Management and Disposal. Management of the Technosphere. 2020;3(2):281-286. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.34828/UdSU.2020.28.81.001. EDN: QZGOMO.
4. Tshovrebov E.S. Reducing The Risks and Threats of Man-Made Hazards Caused by The Formation of Hazardous Waste During the Dismantling of Real Estate. Problems of Risk Management in The Technosphere. 2024;1(69):146-156. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.61260/1998-8990-2024-1-146-156. EDN: OKFCZF.
5. Jun Dong, Yuanjun Tang, Ange Nzihou, Yong Chi, Elsa Weiss-Hortala, Mingjiang Ni et al. Comparison of Waste-To-Energy Technologies of Gasification and Incineration Using Life Cycle Assessment: Case Studies in Finland, France and China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;203:287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.139.
6. Khan I., Kabir Z. Waste-To-Energy Generation Technologies and The Developing Economies: A Multi-Criteria Analysis for Sustainability Assessment. Renewable Energy. 2020;150:320-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.132.
7. Mayer F., Bhandari R., Gäth S. Critical Review On Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Innovative Waste-To-Energy Technologies. Science of The Total Environment. 2019;672:708-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.449.
8. Kirillova A., Zotov V., Musinova N. Engineering Solutions in The Construction of Production Facilities for Waste Processing. MATEC Web of Conferences. 2018;193:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201819302010.
9. Golubkova U.S., Knaub R.V. Ecological and Social Problems of Construction Solid Municipal Waste Landfills. In: Prirodopol'zovanie i okhrana prirody: okhrana pamyatnikov prirody, biologicheskogo i landshaftnogo raznoobraziya Tomskogo Priob'ya i drugikh regionov Rossii. Materialy IX Vserossiiskoi s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii = Nature Management and Conservation: Protection of Natural Monuments, Biological and Landscape Diversity of the Tomsk Ob Region and Other Regions of Russia. Materials of The IX All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation. 21–23 April 2020, Tomsk. Tomsk; 2020. p. 285–289. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/978-5-94621-954-9-2020-68. EDN: TEPFZF.
10. Niyazgulov U.D., Gebgart A.A., Krestinkov V.G., Niyazgulov F.K. Monitoring The State of Waste Disposal Facilities Using Remote Sensing Data. Geodesy and Cartography. 2018;79(11):47-53. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22389/0016-7126-2018-941-11-47-53. EDN: VOELOW.
11. Lukashov S.V., Gamazin V.P., Khokhlova M.V. Multidimensionality and Methods for Solving the Problem of Municipal Solid Waste Utilization. Ecology and Industry of Russia. 2020;24(7):18-23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18412/1816-0395-2020-7-18-23. EDN: XBLTLN.
12. Pavlenko V.I., Kutsenko S.Yu. Actual Goals of Conservation the Quality of the Natural Environment of the Residential Areas of the Russian Arctic. The Eurasian Scientific Journal. 2020;12(5):1-10. (In Russ.). EDN: UKCNDL.
13. Aterekova A.V., Sivaev S.B. Selection of Sites for Waste Management Facilities On the Basis of Spatial Analysis. Urban Studies and Practices. 2016;1(1):70-85. (In Russ.). EDN: ZMVZBP.
14. Velikanova T.V. Methods and Models of Accommodation of Objects of Waste Management in The Region. Fundamental Research. 2013;11-6:1289-1293. (In Russ.). EDN: RUDECX.
15. Shcherbina E.V. Life Cycle Analysis Methodology for The Design of Solid Waste Landfills. Stroitel'nye materialy, oborudovanie, tekhnologii XXI veka. 2005;11(82):69-71. (In Russ.).
16. Rogachev N.S., Gilmundinov V.M. Problems of Accounting the Environmental and Economic Efficiency When Modeling the Sphere of Municipal Solid Waste Management. World of Economics and Management. 2021;21(1):72-85. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2021-21-1-72-85. EDN: DFNSMI.
17. Ortskanov T.A. Town-Planning and Environmental Safety of Polygons SHW Territory. Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel'stvo. 2010;3:150-153. (In Russ.). EDN: NTLBKF.
18. Balabenko E.V., Bogak L.N., Oberemok E.N., Chernysh M.A. Urban Aspects of Selecting Lands for Municipal Solid Waste Disposal Facilities. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2023;13(4):726-738. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2023-4-726-738. EDN: RHBZTB.
19. Mushchanov V.F., Balabenko E.V., Iskrin V.A. Recognition and Assessment of the State of Waste Disposal Areas by Decoding Satellite Images (Using The Example of the City of Makeyevka). PNRPU Bulletin. Applied Ecology. Urban Development. 2024;1:53-68. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15593/2409-5125/2024.01.04. EDN: HTJJJC.
20. Stewart J.Q. Demographic Gravitation: Evidence and Application. Sociometry. 1948;11(1-2):31-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/2785468.
21. Suvorov N.V., Akhunov R.R., Gubarev R.V., Dzyuba E.I., Fayzullin F.S. Applying The Cobb-Douglas Production Function for Analysing the Region’s Industry. Economy of Regions. 2020;16(1):187-200. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-1-14. EDN: ZNLTJO.
22. Saaty R.W. The Analytic Hierarchy Process—What It Is and How It Is Used. Mathematical Modelling. 1987;9(3-5):161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
Review
For citations:
Balabenko E.V. Optimal organization of sites for solid municipal waste management: urban morphology and spatial analysis, multi-factor evaluation. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2025;15(2):347-358. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2025-2-347-358. EDN: CGXVOI
Views:
19
Email this article 