The future of public administration: a digital vector of development

The scale of the tasks of restructuring the national economy requires not only the concentration of resources in strategically important areas, but also the creation of synergies between production capacities and the goals of creating new transport corridors, staffing, solving the tasks of updating the social sphere and ensuring the security and sovereignty of our country. In a number of business segments, contradictions between the interests of government authorities and business entities are growing. As a result, many successfully implemented projects are not accompanied by multiplier effects in related areas of the economy. At the state level, there is no overall picture of the spatial development of the country. As a result, public administration in conditions of budget constraints caused by increasing sanctions is deprived of an objective basis not only for setting goals and making managerial decisions, but also for developing executive mechanisms to achieve them. The measures taken by the Ministry of Construction of the Russian Federation in terms of improving the quality of solutions are focused on the use of analytical data accumulated during construction and urban planning activities. The latter are necessary both for forecasting and for planning construction activities, making it possible to reduce and, if possible, eliminate design errors, anticipate possible problems of interaction between participants in investment and construction processes at various levels and, as a result, improve the quality of construction and shorten the duration of the investment and construction cycle.

1. Zaitseva L.I., Viktorov M.Yu., Yaskova N.Yu. Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Construction as a Factor in the Practical Implementation of Russia's National Development Projects. Moscow: RANEPA, 2022. 88 p. (In Russ.).

2. Cashman P.K., Ginnivan E. Digital Justice: Online Resolution of Minor Civil Disputes and the Use of Digital Technology in Complex Litigation and Class Actions. Macquarie Law Journal. 2019;19:39-79.

3. Yudelson K.S. Industry and Interindustry Principles for Considering Economic Disputes. Herald of Civil Procedure. 2024;14(4):138-142. (In Russ.). EDN: IAXFSS.

4. Kamenkov V.S. The Right on the Media Ability of Disputes, Including Economic Disputes. Aktualnye problemy grazhdanskogo prava. 2023;1:173-183. (In Russ.). EDN: FPNHZF.

5. Kirsanov A.R. Types of Integrated Development of Territories. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 2021;4:84-89. (In Russ.). EDN: ROZHUK.

6. Sulumov S.Kh. Economic Instability as a Determining Factor in the Economy. Journal of Economy and Business: Theory and Practice. 2021;9-2:83-87. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2411-0450-2021-9-2-83- 87. EDN: YNUSFS.

7. Romanova N.V. Unfinished Construction as an Important and Special Asset of the Company. Globus. 2020;5:82-85. (In Russ.). EDN: TLRTXZ.

8. Ivantsova S.N. Analysis of Budget Performance. Byudzhetnyi uchet. 2020;1:11-15. EDN: NUULWQ.

9. Inshakova A.O., Tymchuk Yu.A. Digital Technologies of Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods: Foreign Practice and Prospects of Application in Russia. Journal of Law and Administration. 2018;1:23-31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/2073-8420-2018-1-46-23-31. EDN: UURDRW.

10. Utkina V.N., Gryaznov S.U., Babushkina D.R. Problems and Prospects of Implementation of Information Modeling Technology in the Construction Field of Russia: Problems and Prospects of Implementation. Economy, Governance and Law Basis. 2019;1:57-61. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51608/23058641_2019_1_57. EDN: YPHGPG.

11. Kostin K.B., Berezovskaya A.A. Modern Technologies of the Digital Economy as a Driver of Growth in the World Market of Goods and Services. Journal of International Economic Affairs. 2019;9(2):455-480. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/eo.9.2.40511. EDN: OHSRAP.

12. Yakhya M. BIM Technologies in Design in Russia. Science Magazine. 2021;3:99-107. (In Russ.). EDN: LPZTWG.

13. Novikov M.A., Belyaev A.V., Yudin S.V. Some Questions of Creation of the Design Documentation in Building Designing. Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2011;6:455-459. (In Russ.). EDN: OWFSUF.

14. Cavallo A., Ghezzi A., Balocco R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research: Present Debates and Future Directions. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 2019;15:1291-1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0526-3.

15. Zhuravlev P.A., Sborshikov S.B On the Question of Use of Resource-Technological Modeling in the Formation of Investment Programs. Bulletin of Belgorod State Technological University Named After. V. G. Shukhov. 2017;7:198-201. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.12737/article_5940f01b5778c2.44174358. EDN: ZDDACB.

16. Savina S.V. Possibilities of Online Platforms for Small and Medium Businesses. Samoupravlenie. 2021;3:582-585. (In Russ.). EDN: CUBVKR.

17. Areo G. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning on Real Estate: Current Applications and Future Trends. ResearchGate. 2024:1-10.

18. Ivanov M.V., Rumiantseva S.Yu. A New Ecosystem of Digital Real Estate: Developmental Stages, Technologies and Prospects. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2020;10(4):524- 533. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2020-4-524-533. EDN: YLPFMF.

19. Gareev I.F., Mukhametova N.N. The Introduction of Digital Technologies at the Stages of the Life Cycle of Residential Real Estate. Russian Journal of Housing Research. 2018;5(3):305-322. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/zhs.5.3.39692. EDN: YRLKJV.

20. Berman S.J. Digital Transformation: Opportunities to Create New Business Models. Strategy & Leadership. 2012;40(2):16-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878571211209314.

21. Atzei N., Bartoletti M., Cimoli T. A Survey of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts (SoK). In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer, 2017. Vol. 10204. P. 164–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54455-6_8.