Research of technogenic cycles of resource and product circulation as an information and analytical base for forecasting and preventing technogenic emergencies

The relevance of the research lies in the unresolved problem of preventing socio-economic, environmental and other consequences of technogenic emergencies. The purpose of the work was to study technogenic cycles of resource and product circulation in the format of forming an information and analytical database for forecasting and preventing technogenic emergencies. Research objectives: analysis of literary sources on the topic of working with the choice of strategy and tactics of the conducted research, study of the stages of technogenic cycles of turnover of products and raw materials, objects and processes of negative impact on the environment as potential sources of occurrence and development of natural and technogenic emergencies, development of proposals for the greening of technogenic cycles in in order to ensure the safety of the population and the environmental safety of the territories. The research results presented by the authors are not final, they will be used as an information and analytical base in the process of scientific and methodological substantiation of forecasting dangerous technogenic events and processes in order to prevent accidents, disasters, emergency situations that pose a danger to the natural environment, life and health of the future and future generations of Russian citizens.

1. Akimov V.A., Oltyan I.Yu., Ivanova E.O. Natural, Anthropogenic and Biological and Social Emergency Situations Ranking Technique by Catastrophic Degree. Civil Security Technology. 2021;18(1):4-7. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54234/CST.19968493.2021.18.1.67.1.4. EDN: IOGGXC.

2. Lomakin M.I., Dokukin A.V., Moshkov V.B., Oltyan I.Yu., Niyazova Ju.M. Emergency Situation Damage Assessment in the Conditions of Incomplete Data. Civil Security Technology. 2022;19(3):32-36. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54234/CST.19968493.2022.19.3.73. EDN: ZUSCWO.

3. Aref'eva E.V., Oltyan I.Yu. The Role of International Cooperation for Better Disaster Risk Forecast in the Context of Ongoing Climate Change. Scientific and Educational Problems of Civil Protection. 2017;2:7-9. (In Russ.). EDN: ZBGXSB.

4. Faleev M.I., Oltyan I.Yu., Aref'eva E.V., Bolgov M.V. Methodology and Technology of Remote Risk Assessment. Issues of Risk Analysis. 2018;15(4):6-19. (In Russ.). EDN: YCNCAP.

5. Oltyan I.Y., Arefyeva E.V., Kotosonov A.S. Remote Assessment of an Integrated Emergency Risk Index. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020;962:1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/962/4/042053.

6. Suzdaleva A.L. Ecological Globalistics and Sustainable Development at the Stage of Technogenic Transformation of the Biosphere. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2020;1:6- 11. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869780920010196. EDN: HKJMPL.

7. Goldstein B., Rasmussen F. LCA of Buildings and the Built Environment. In: Life Cycle Assessment. Theory and Practice. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2018. P. 695–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_28.

8. Hertwich E., Lifset R., Pauliuk S., Heeren N. Resource Efficiency and Climate Change: Material Efficiency Strategies for a Low-Carbon Future. Nairobi, Kenya: UNESCO, 2020. 179 p.

9. Pupyrev E.I. Life Support Systems of Cities. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 246 p. (In Russ.).

10. Lundström S., De Haan J., Sturm J.-E. Market-Oriented Institutions and Policies and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey. Journal of Economic Surveys. 2006;20(2):157-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0950-0804.2006.00278.x.

11. Kutsenko V.V., Gurova T.F. Environmental Safety: Methodological Approaches and Methods of Implementation. Moscow: MNEPU. 2003. 158 p. (In Russ.). EDN: QJITLB.

12. Telichenko V.I., Benuzh A.A., Glotova E.P. Environmental Safety of Construction In Russia: Reality and Prospects. In: Fundamental, exploratory and applied research of RAASN on scientific support for the development of architecture, urban planning and the construction industry of the Russian Federation in 2021. Moscow: ASV Publishing House, 2022. P. 441–449. (In Russ.). EDN: CBIYVG.

13. Tskhovrebov E.S. A New Approach to Assessing the Parameters of Sustainable Development in the Format of the Magnitude of the Prevented Environmental Hazard. Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2023;3:50-68. (In Russ.). EDN: EHNHBO.

14. Grafkina M.V., Potapov A.D. Assessment of Environmental Safety of Building Systems as Natural-Technogenic Complexes (Theoretical Foundations). Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2008;1:23- 28. (In Russ.). EDN: MVHAJP.

15. Azarov V.N., Manzhilevskaya S.E., Petrenko L.K. Оrganizational and Economic Problems of Ecological Safety in Construction. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019;698:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/698/5/055007.

16. Vladimirov S.N. Problems of Recycling Construction Industry Waste. System Technologies. 2016;19:101- 105. (In Russ.). EDN: WCNXNV.

17. Petropavlovskaya V.B., Artamonova S.V., Shchipanskaya E.O., Ratkevich E.A., Petropavlovskii K.S. Environmental Management in Ash and Slag Waste Management in Russia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022;1010:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1010/1/012135.

18. Sereda T.G., Kostarev S.N., Novikova O.V., Ivanova I.E. Study of Solid Municipal Waste Accumulation Rates in Penitentiary Facilities in Perm Krai During the Pandemic of 2020. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2022;1043:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1043/1/012005.

19. Volynkina E.P. Analysis of the State and Problems of Processing Industrial Waste in Russia. Bulletin of the Siberian State Industrial University. 2017;2:43-49. (In Russ.). EDN: YTOUCP.

20. Elgizawy S., El-Haggar S., Nassar K. Slum Development Using Zero Waste Concepts: Construction Waste Case Study. Procedia Engineering. 2016;145:1306-1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.04.168.

21. Ehresman T.G., Okereke C. Environmental Justice and Conceptions of the Green Economy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics. 2015;15:13-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9265-2.

22. Chernykhivska A.V. Modern Perspectives of Development of “Green” Economy. Economic Processes Management: International Scientific E-Journal. 2015;1:1-8.

23. Domenech T., Bahn-Walkowiak B. Transition Towards a Resource Efficient Circular Economy in Europe: Policy Lessons From the EU and the Member States. Ecological Economics. 2019;155:7-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.001.

24. Kirchherr J., Reike D., Hekkert M. Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: an Analysis of 114 Definitions. Resources, Conservation & Recycling. 2017;127:221-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.

25. Hart J., Adams K., Giesekam J., Densley Tingley D., Pomponi F. Barriers and Drivers in a Circular Economy: The Case of the Built Environment. Procedia CIRP. 2019;80:619-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.12.015.

26. Tskhovrebov E.S. Formation of Regional Management Strategies of Secondary Resource Handling. Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2019;14(4):450-463. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2019.4.450-463. EDN: EPNQHR.

27. Tskhovrebov E.S. Ecological and Economic Aspects of Planning Of Placing and Designing Of Industrial Targets on Processing, Recyclings, To Neutralisation of A Waste. Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2018;13(11):1326-1340. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2018.11.1326-1340. EDN: YQNVNJ.

28. Kalaeva S., Tshovrebov E., Gennadieva A., Kalaev R New Approaches to Oily Waste Treatment to Minimise Technology-Related Threats and Risks. Reliability: Theory & Applications. 2024;19(6):886-892.

29. Tskhovrebov E., Velichko E., Niyazgulov U. Planning Measures for Environmentally Safe Handling with Extremely and Highly Hazardous Wastes in Industrial, Building and Transport Complex. Materials Science Forum. 2019;945:988-994. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.945.988.

30. Tshovrebov E., Moshkov V., Oltyan I., Niyazgulov F. A New Approach to Assessing the Accuracy of Forecasting of Emergencies with Environmental Consequences Based on the Theory of Fuzzy Logic. Nature Environment and Pollution Technology. 2024;23(4):2477-2481. https://doi.org/10.46488/NEPT.2024.v23i04.054