Integral assessment of engineering protection structures of transport structures from hydrodynamic effects of sea waves
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2025-4-745-755
EDN: UTEJLD
Abstract
When making decisions on the placement of road and railway route plans, the location of bridge crossings and other transport infrastructure facilities, it is important to assess the size of capital investments. A significant part of the cost is the provision of engineering protection. In this paper, a method is proposed for the integral assessment of the need for the construction and selection of protective structures of transport facilities from the hydrodynamic effects of sea waves. An algorithm is described for determining the degree of need for engineering protection of transport facilities and their infrastructure based on an analysis and expert assessment of the state of the coast, facilities and processes in the coastal zone of the seas. Consideration of the influence of objects and processes in the coastal zone when choosing the type of engineering protection structures from the hydrodynamic effects of the natural
aquatic environment is proposed to be determined by quantitative integral assessment. A preliminary consolidated estimate of the cost of engineering protection measures is given, depending on the degree
of need for protection, which, in turn, is numerically expressed by the degree of need for the construction
and selection of the type of engineering protection structures. The results of the study can be used to
assess the risk of an accident (by determining the hazard coefficient based on an indicator that takes into
account the possible consequences and the amount of material damage caused by the accident), as well
as to determine the aggregated economic indicators of the construction cost.
About the Author
G. V. TlyavlinaRussian Federation
Galina V. Tlyavlina,
Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Head of the Laboratory of Modeling, Calculations and Standardization in Hydraulic Engineering, Joint Stock Company Central Research Institute of Transport Construction
1, Yana Fabritciusa St., Sochi 354002
Doctoral Student of Bridge and Tonnels Department
9 House, 9 Bldg. Obraztsova St., Moscow 127994
Author ID: 604630
Competing Interests:
Автор заявляет об отсутствии конфликта
интересов.
References
1. Tliavlina G.V., Tliavlin R.M., Megrelishvili I.Yu. Comparison of the Indices of Various Coast-Protection Structures. Transport Construction. 2011;5:10-12. (In Russ.). EDN: NZAHFJ.
2. Bykova O.N., Putikhin Yu.E., Repnikova V.M. Scenarios for the Transport Infrastructure Development in the Vladimir Region. Journal of Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. 2022;12(3):1031-1050. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.12.3.114308. EDN: PIPPKY.
3. Qin Chen, Lixia Wang, Haihong Zhao, Douglass S.L. Prediction of Storm Surges and Wind Waves on Coastal Highways in Hurricane-Prone Areas. Journal of Coastal Research. 2007;23(5):1304-1317. https://doi.org/10.2112/05-0465.1.
4. Saengsupavanich C. Flaws in Coastal Erosion Vulnerability Assessment: Physical and Geomorphological Parameters. Arabian Journal of Geosciences. 2022;15:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09368-2.
5. Ataei N., Steams M., Padgett J.E. Response Sensitivity for Probabilistic Damage Assessment of Coastal Bridges Under Surge and Wave Loading. Transportation Research Record. 2010;2202(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.3141/2202-12.
6. Wandji Zoumb, P. A. Fourier regression model predicting train-bridge interactions under wind and wave actions / P. A. Wandji Zoumb, X. Li // Structure & Infrastructure Engineering. 2023. Vol. 19, No. 10. P. 1489-1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2022.2033281.
7. Tlyavlina G.V., Tlyavlin R.M., Emelianova G.A. Scenarios of Accidents of Engineering Structures Protecting Transport Facilities from the Hydrodynamic Effects of Sea Waves. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2025;15(2):292-300. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2025-2-292-300. EDN: LIIKCR.
8. Ashpiz E., Savin A., Tlyavlin R., Tlyavlina G. Urgent Issues of Anti-Deformation Measures to Protect Coasta Railways. In: 14th Medcoast Congress On Coastal and Marine Sciences, Engineering, Management and Conservation. 22–26 October 2019, Marmaris. Marmaris; 2019. P. 841–852. EDN: JWHEBE.
9. Tlyavlina G.V., Yaroslavtsev N.A., Petrov V.A., Tlyavlin R.M. Protection Methods of Transportation Facilities on Open Sandy Shores of Inner Seas. Transport Construction. 2015;6:14-16. (In Russ.). EDN: SGDDMX.
10. Stokes K., Poate T., Masselink G., King E., Saulter A., Ely N. Forecasting Coastal Overtopping at Engineered and Area Naturally DefendedCoastlines. Coastal Engineering. 2021;164:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2020.103827.
11. Deping Cao, Weikai Tan, Jing Yuan Assessment of Wave Overtopping Risk for Pedestrian Visiting the Crest of Coastal Structure. Applied Ocean Research. 2022;120:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102985.
12. Lira-Loarca A., Caceres-Euse A., De-Leo F., Besio G. Wave Modeling with Unstructured Mesh for Hindcast, Forecast and Wave Hazard Applications in the Mediterranean Sea. Applied Ocean Research. 2022;122:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103118.
13. Chenlei Guan, Damin Dong, Feng Shen, Xin Gao, Linyan Chen Hierarchical Structure Model of Safety Risk Factors in New Coastal Towns: A Systematic Analysis Using the DEMATEL-ISM-SNA Method. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19(17):1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710496.
14. Khavansky A., Latun V., Khoroshev O., Merinova Yu., Nedoseka L. Risk Assessment of Hazardous Abrasion and Landslide Processes in The Coastal Zone of the Azov Sea. E3S Web of Conferences. 2020;175:18. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017506008.
15. De Finis S., Romano A., Bellotti G. Numerical and Laboratory Analysis of Post-Overtopping Wave Impacts on a Storm Wall for a Dike-Promenade Structure. Coastal Engineering. 2020;155:1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103598.
16. Latypov A.I., Garaeva A.N., Luneva O.V., Korolev E.A. Integral Assessment of the Suffosion Hazard at the Bugulma Plateau, the Bugulma-Belebey Upland. Geoekologiya. Inzhenernaya geologiya, gidrogeologiya, geokriologiya. 2022;6:37-45. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31857/S0869780922060066. EDN: PRRXAQ.
17. Arkhipov D.E., Edemsky K.E., Kozhevnikova S.I., Dmitriev V.V. Development of Monitoring Of Water Bodies Based On Integrated Assessment of Ecological Status and Modeling of Ecological Functions. European Journal of Natural History. 2022;2:31-37. (In Russ.). EDN: WEMDZL.
18. Dmitriev V.V., Tretiakov V.Yu., Zyryanova D.S., Ovsepyan A.A., Pochepko S.Yu., Nemchinova A.V. et al. Assessment of The Ecological Status of Reservoirs Based on The Construction of Composite Indices: Methodology, Results, Prospects Article Title. Gidrometeorologiya i ekologiya. 2024;75:293-309. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.33933/2713-3001-2023-75-293-309. EDN: LJPOAJ.
19. Aleksandrova L.V., Vasilev V.Yu., Dmitriev V.V., Myakisheva N.V., Ogurtsov A.N., Tretyakov V.Yu. et al. Multicriteria Geographical and Ecological Assessments of The State and Stability of Natural and Urbanized Systems. Moscow: All-Russian Institute of Scientific and Technical Information, Russian Academy of Sciences, 2000. 275 p. (In Russ.). EDN: ZVPHGF.
20. Lishchishin I.V., Tljavlin R.M., Tljavlina G.V. Protection of Transport Constructions Against Wave Influence in the Conditions of Coast Use for the Recreational Purposes. Transport Construction. 2011;3:2-5. (In Russ.). EDN: NYJPNF.
21. Petrov V.A. Stability of an Artificial Pebble Beach in Front of Slope Structures during Upsurge. Power Technology and Engineering. 2022;55:659-666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10749-022-01413-8.
22. Tlyavlina G.V., Tlyavlin R.M., Yaroslavtsev N.A. Protection of Transport Structures from Wave Action by Creating a Sandy Wave-Damping Beach. World of Transport and Transportation. 2023;21(5):24-33 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30932/1992-3252-2023-21-5-3. EDN: HJTUGM.
23. Tlyavlin R.M. Breakwaters for the Protection of Clamping Sections of Railways. The Siberian Transport University Bulletin. 2024;2:23-32. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52170/1815-9265_2024_69_23. EDN: GTCJLN.
24. Cervantes M.S., Diaz-Carrasco P., Moragues M.V., Clavero M., Losada M.A. Uncertainties of the Actual Engineering Formulas for Coastal Protection Slopes. The Dimensional Analysis and Experimental Method. In: Proceedings of the 39th IAHR World Congress. 19–24 June 2022, Granada. Granada; 2022. P. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3850/IAHR-39WC252171192022900.
25. Weiqiu Chen, Marconi A., van Gent M.R.A., Warmink J.J., Hulscher S.J.M.H. Experimental Study on the Influence of Berms and Roughness on Wave Overtopping at Rock-Armoured Dikes. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2020;8(6):1-21. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8060446.
26. Finagenov O.M., Beshlian A.R. Risk in Hydroengineering. Proceedings of the VNIIG. 2007;246:107-112. (In Russ.). EDN: IBWITV.
27. Finagenov O.M., Shtilman V.B., Shulman S.G., Yudelevich A.M. Development of Methods for Assessing the Reliability of Hydraulic Structures. Proceedings of the VNIIG. 2021;300:7-20. (In Russ.). EDN: IANMJK.
Review
For citations:
Tlyavlina G.V. Integral assessment of engineering protection structures of transport structures from hydrodynamic effects of sea waves. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2025;15(4):745-755. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2025-4-745-755. EDN: UTEJLD
JATS XML



















