Forecasting and assessment of efficiency and reliability of construction systems during emergency response
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2023-2-307-315
Abstract
The aim of the work involves the improvement of management processes during the life cycle of major construction objects, focused on enhancing the efficiency and reliability of construction systems in emergency situations with limited availability of resources. The relevance of the study is stipulated by the increasing trend in natural and man-made disasters on the territory of the Russian Federation, including floods. Registered emergencies associated with floods indicate that it is necessary to optimize the construction management processes through adequate and timely resource allocation in order to prevent and mitigate the consequences of such emergencies, which can be achieved by using the target-focused principles for construction management. The paper systematizes the challenges in construction management and identifies trends, specific features, and regularities of the organization of construction processes in emergency response. Based on this analysis, the recommendations are offered for improving construction processes using the target-focused principles in emergency response and ensuring the fail-safety of buildings exposed to flood waters.
About the Author
V. V. Peshkov
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation
Competing Interests:
Russian Federation
Vitaly V. Peshkov - Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor, Director of the Institute of Architecture, Construction and Design.
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664074
Competing Interests:
The author declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article
References
1. Martin-Breen P., Anderies J. Marti. Resilience: a literature review'. Brighton: IDS; 2011. 4 p.
2. Mohamed Sayed Bassiony Ahmed Abd ElKarim, Omar Aly Mosa El Nawawy, Ahmed Mohamed Abdel-Alim. Identification and assessment of risk factors affecting construction projects. HBRC Journal. 2017;13(2):202-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2015.05.001.
3. Arefieva E.V., Bolgov M.V. Specifics of natural flood forecast for disaster risk reduction. case study of Krasnodar krai. Tekhnologii grazhdanskoi bezopasnosti. 2018;15(4):40-47. (In Russ.). EDN: VOPZGD. https://doi.org/10.54234/CST.19968493.2018.15.4.58.6.40.
4. Ignatenkova V.A. Problems associated with coastal areas of the River Angara within the Irkutsk agglomeration: history of changes from late 17th to early 21st century. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitel'stvo. Nedvizhimost' = Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2021;11(4):704-715. (In Russ.). EDN: IPTYYP. https://doi.org/10.21285/22272917-2021-4-704-715.
5. Korolev V.Yu., Aref'eva E.V., Nefedova Yu.S., Rybakov A.V., Lazovskii N.A. Forecasting of risks of floods on the ground of method of estimating of probabilities of exceeding of critical values within non-ordinary streams of extreme events. Nauchnye i obrazovatel'nye problemy grazhdanskoi zashchity. 2015;1:40-56. (In Russ.). EDN: TNCGOF.
6. Bezrukikh O.A., Matveeva M.V. Managing construction processes in emergency response to floods. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost' = Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2021;11(3):422-431. (In Russ.). EDN: MYJDSA. https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-3-422-431.
7. Kabanov V.N. Organizational and technological reliability of the construction process. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2018;77(1):59-67. https://doi.org/10.18720/MCE.77.6.
8. Ginzburg A.V. Organizational and technological reliability of construction systems. Vestnik MGSU. 2010;4:251-255. (In Russ.). EDN: NEJDYB.
9. Sborshchikov S.B., Shinkareva G.N., Maslova L.A., Leybman D.M. Evaluation of effectiveness of managing construction project realization under the influence of random factors. Vestnik MGSU. 2017;12(11):1240-1247. (In Russ.). EDN: YMEBRE. https://doi.org/10.22227/19970935.2017.11.1240-1247.
10. Mikhaylova E.V. Determining the duration of construction of buildings and structures under uncertainty. Stroitel'noe proizvodstvo = Construction production. 2020;1:12-16. (In Russ.). EDN: LLMNFV. https://doi.org/10.54950/26585340_2020_1_12.
11. Lapidus A.A. The influence of modern technological and organizational actions for achievement of the planned results of the construction projects. Tekhnologiya i organizatsiya stroitel'nogo proizvodstva. 2013;2:1. (In Russ.). EDN: RDIYCF.
12. Paslawski J. Flexible approach for construction process management under risk and uncertainty. Procedia Engineering. 2017;208:114-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.028.
13. Kozlova E.A. Innovative methods in construction and their impact on the duration of construction production. Vestnik sovremennykh issledovanii. 2018;12.5:165-168. (In Russ.). EDN: YSQSGL.
14. Ageev S.V., Podrezov J.V., Romanov A.S., Timoshenko Z.V. Features of formation and main characteristics of avalanches on the territory of the Russian Federation. Problemy bezopasnosti i chrezvychainykh situatsii = Safety and emergencies problems. 2020;1:116-120. (In Russ.). EDN: TRMNVQ. https://doi.org/10.36535/08694176-2020-01-12.
15. Rozdobut'ko D.A. Constructive solution of low-rise buildings erected in coastal areas. BST: Byulleten' stroitel'noi tekhniki. 2023;2:35-37. (In Russ.). EDN: MFMHAT.
16. Maslyaev A.V. About the safety of mass residential and public buildingsin case of dangerous natural influences. Zhilishchnoe stroitel'stvo = Housing construction. 2021;1-2:40-49. (In Russ.). EDN: XJAAVO. https://doi.org/10.31659/00444472-2021-1-2-40-49.
17. Maslyaev A.V. Russian settlements are not protected against the impact of natural hazards. Zhilishchnoe stroitel'stvo = Housing construction. 2019;5:36-42. (In Russ.). EDN: HWKYTM. https://doi.org/10.31659/0044-44722019-5-36-42.
18. Ishtryakova T.R. Comparison of domestic and foreign approaches to managing the life cycle of construction objects. Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi ekonomiki = Actual issues of the modern economy. 2020;5:296-301. (In Russ.). EDN: PVOJMX. https://doi.org/10.34755/IROK.2020.55.78.073.
19. Matveeva M.V., Kozma M.V. Mechanism for increasing rating of ESG-factors of construction investment life cycle. Baikal Research Journal. 2022;13(3):25. (In Russ.). EDN: LVJKEL. https://doi.org/10.17150/24116262.2022.13(3).25.
20. Gradinar' M.G. Management of construction processes by modeling their parameters. Globus. 2020;3(49):27-28. (In Russ.).
21. Krivogina D.N., Alakina S.V., Alakin D.E. Model for integrated assessment of alternative characteristics of a building system (on the example of road tunnels). Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitel'stvo. Nedvizhimost' = Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2020;10(2): 220-227. (In Russ.). EDN: IJEUPJ. https://doi.org/10.21285/22272917-2020-2-220-227.
22. Medyanik Yu.V. Improvement of the engineering system of investment and construction activities. Voprosy innovatsionnoi ekonomiki = Russian journal of innovation economics. 2019;9(2):501-514. (In Russ.). EDN: SAHKWW. https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.9.2.40704.
23. Grabovyy P.G., Starovoitov A.S. Roblems of individual housing construction in Russia and possible solutions. Nedvizhimost': ekonomika, upravlenie = Real estate: economics, management. 2019;1:94-103. (In Russ.). EDN: RDDPDV.
24. Karakozova I.V. Issledovanie universal'noi posledovatel'nosti stroitel'nykh rabot. Vestnik MGSU. 2020;15(9):1321-1333. (In Russ.). EDN: PORILC. https://doi.org/10.22227/19970935.2020.9.1321-1333.
25. Morozenko A.A., Voronkov I.E. Problems of estimating and improving the reliability of elements of organizational structure of an investment and construction project. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitel'stvo. 2014;12:30-32. (In Russ.). EDN: TBVEHR.
Review
For citations:
Peshkov V.V. Forecasting and assessment of efficiency and reliability of construction systems during emergency response. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2023;13(2):307-315. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2023-2-307-315
Views:
135
Email this article 