A method for a comprehensive assessment of the ecological component of the environment based on a case study of the Kirovsky district of the Perm city
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-1-84-93
Abstract
Today, the problems of the ecological state of the environment are acutely felt by all living organisms. The scale and nature of environmental pollution are directly related to the types of production, the amount and quality of emissions, the level of technologies and treatment plants used, the geographical location, the nature of dispersion of pollution and its impact on landscapes, ecosystems, and their components in the urban environment. The need to improve the state of the environment makes the research in the field of integrated assessment of the state of the ecosystem and its components relevant. The study of this area through the prism of integrated assessment provides an opportunity to visually assess the ecological situation of all components of the ecosystem. This will make it possible to objectively look at the investigated area (territory), identify the main influencing factors of pollution, which will narrow the search for the reasons for an underestimation of some territory and give appropriate recommendations for improving the situation. The purpose of this research is to investigate and assess the ecological situation of one of the micro districts (Kirovsky district of the Perm city) on the basis of the proposed method of a comprehensive assessment of the ecological component of the environment. With the help of this method, a step-by-step assessment of each component of the environment was made, i.e., of the substances which, according to the authors, are quite strong factors affecting the environment, in which the pollution was produced. Next, a general assessment of the environment was conducted based on the assessments of substances, as a result, enabling a comprehensive assessment of the entire environment as a general assessment of the entire environmental situation in the form of a convolution tree with assigned development matrices. Based on the results obtained, a conclusion was made on the possible reasons for the decrease or increase in the assessment of the territory.
About the Authors
K. S. Fiyashko
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ksenia S. Fiyashko, Master's degree student
29, Komsomolsky prospect, Perm, 614990
D. N. Krivogina
Perm National Research Polytechnic University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Daria N. Krivogina, Cand. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor of the Department of Construction Engineering and Materials Science
29, Komsomolsky prospect, Perm, 614990
References
1. Dridze TM. Social communication as a textual activity in semiosocial psychology. Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. 1996;3:145–152. (In Russ.)
2. Forrester JW. Urban Dynamics. Moscow: Progress; 1974. 286 p. (In Russ.)
3. Gutnov AE. Cities and people: selected works. Moscow: Lad'ya; 1993. 320 p. (In Russ.)
4. Fajzullin FS. Sociological problems of the city. Saratov: Saratov University Publ.; 1981. 207 p. (In Russ.)
5. Glinskiy V, Serga L, Khvan M. Assessment of Environmental Parameters Impact on the Level of Sustainable Development of Territories. Procedia CIRP. 2016;40:625–630. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.145
6. Istomin EP, Sokolov AG, Abramov VM, Gogoberidze GG, Fokicheva AA. Methods for external factors assessing within geoinformation management of territories. SGEM2015 Conference Proceedings: 15th International SGEM GeoConference on Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing. June 18–24, 2015. Book 2, vol. 1. pp. 729–736. https://doi.org/10.5593/SGEM2015/B21/S8.092
7. Kopylov IS. Principles and criteria of the integrated estimation of the geo-ecological condition of the natural and urbanized territories. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya = Modern Problems of Science and Education. Surgery. 2011;6:285. Available from: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=5214 [Accessed 10th January 2021] (In Russ.)
8. Kharitonov VA, Geikhman LK, Krivogina DN. Mechanisms of object oriented pricing in venture project management tasks. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seria Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy. 2017;12(1):61–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2017-1-61-77
9. Haritonov VA, Vychegzhanin AV, Grevcev AM, Krivogina DN, Safonov NI. Tools for connecting creativity and manufacturability in tasks of subject-oriented management. Upravlenie jekonomicheskimi sistemami: elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal, 2017;7(101):1. Available from: http://www.uecs.ru/uecs-101-1012017/item/4474-2017-06-27-08-20-00 [Accessed 10th January 2021] (In Russ.)
10. Kharitonov VA, Dmitryukov MS, Larionova RA. Making concerted investment decisions in cultural heritage management: algorithms of intellectual support. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seria Ekonomika = Perm University Herald. Economy. 2016;3(30):61–76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17072/1994-9960-2016-3-61-76
11. Dvinskikh SA, Kitaev AB. Ecological condition of the small rivers of perm city. Geograficheskij vestnik = Geographical Bulletin. 2011;2(17):32–43. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Fiyashko K.S., Krivogina D.N. A method for a comprehensive assessment of the ecological component of the environment based on a case study of the Kirovsky district of the Perm city. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2021;11(1):84-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-1-84-93
Views:
78
Email this article 