Preview

Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost

Advanced search

Environmental aspects in construction. Environmental management in constructing autonomous facilities

https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-4-674-689

Abstract

The present work provides an experimental assessment and proves the possibility of reducing wastewater flow rates in water treatment systems, as well as storm and household sewage, to volumes allowing their inland transportation, which would help avoid environmental pollution and costs associated with building drainage networks. The paper describes major environmental problems that often arise while establishing water supply and drainage systems at new facilities under construction, remote from drainage networks. New reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane technologies are considered that ensure high-quality purification of both drinkable and process water and wastewater treatment, allowing the latter to be reused for technical purposes. The main advantage of new technologies comprises a significant reduction in water consumption for the balance-of-plant needs, which allows discharges to sewers to be avoided. The study provides process diagrams and experiments demonstrating the possibilities of reducing the volume of concentrates. Technologies for residential building sites are proposed, offering a possibility of designing autonomous systems of water supply and discharge (runoffs and sediments) by vehicles. Furthermore, the volume of wastewater is less than 0.5% of that of water consumed for drinking needs. The described approach to designing water supply and wastewater treatment systems can be used for developing waterworks systems at facilities remote from water supply and sewerage networks, as well as reservoirs where treated wastewater can be discharged. Wastewater purified by reverse osmosis can be used for feeding the recycling water supply network (equipment cooling) and green spaces irrigation.

About the Authors

D. V. Spitsov
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Dmitriy V. Spitsov - Cand. Sci (Eng.), Associate Professor of the Department of Water Supply and Water Disposal, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University).

26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337


Competing Interests:

None



A. V. Saimullov
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Aleksei V. Saymullov - Postgraduate student of the Department of Water Supply and Water Disposal, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University).

26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337


Competing Interests:

None



A. G. Pervov
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (MGSU)
Russian Federation

Alexey G. Pervov - Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Associate Professor of the Department of Water Supply and Water Disposal, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (National Research University).

26 Yaroslavskoye Shosse, Moscow, 129337


Competing Interests:

None



References

1. Lei Jiang, Yue Tu, Xiangmin Li, Haixiang Li. Application of reverse osmosis in purifying drinking water. E3S Web of Conferences. 2018;38:01037. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183801037.

2. Ghoufi A, Dražević E, Szymczyk A. Interactions of Organics within Hydrated Selective Layer of Reverse Osmosis Desalination Membrane: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study. Environmental Science and Technology. 2017;51(5):2714-2719. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b05153.

3. Scholes RC, Stiegler AN, Anderson CM, Sedlak DL. Enabling Water Reuse by Treatment of Reverse Osmosis Concentrate: The Promise of Constructed Wetlands. ACS Environmental Au. 2021;1(1):7-17. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00013.

4. Ngai Yin Yip, Brogioli D, Hamelers HVM, Nijmeijer K. Salinity Gradients for Sustainable Energy: Primer, Progress, and Prospects. Environmental Science and Technology. 2016;50(22):12072-12094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03448.

5. Marron EL, Mitch WA, von Gunten U, Sedlak DL. A Tale of Two Treatments: The Multiple Barrier Approach to Removing Chemical Contaminants During Potable Water Reuse. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2019;52(3):615-622. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00612.

6. Mahto A, Mondal D, Polisetti V, Bhatt J, Nidhi MR, Prasad K, et al. Sustainable Water Reclamation from Different Feed Streams by Forward Osmosis Process Using Deep Eutectic Solvents as Reusable Draw Solution. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(49):14623-14632. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03046.

7. Yawei Du, Haoran Gu, Xinyu Sun, Huining Deng, Lixin Xie, Yan Liu. Simultaneous optimization of size and operation for seawater reverse osmosis network with permeate split and inter-stage permeate split designs. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2021;60(10):4041-4059. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c06163.

8. Pervov A, Xuan Quyet Nguyen. Application of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration techniques at municipal drinking water facilities. E3S Web of Conferences. 2019;97:06004. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20199706004.

9. Pranić M, Kimani EM, Biesheuvel PM, Porada S. Desalination of Complex Multi-Ionic Solutions by Reverse Osmosis at Different pH Values, Temperatures, and Compositions. ACS Omega. 2021;6(30):19946-19955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02931.

10. Davenport DM, Deshmukh A, Werber JR, Elimelech M. High-pressure reverse osmosis for energy-efficient hypersaline brine desalination: current status, design considerations, and research needs. Environmental Science and Technology Letters. 2018;5(8):467-475. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.8b00274.

11. Zhangxin Wang, Dejun Feng, Yuanmiaoliang Chen, Di He, Elimelech M. Comparison of Energy Consumption of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis and Low-Salt-Rejection Reverse Osmosis for Brine Management. Environmental Science and Technology. 2021;55(15):10714-10723. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01638.

12. Cappelle M, Walker WSh, Davis TA. Improving Desalination Recovery Using Zero Discharge Desalination (ZDD): A Process Model for Evaluating Technical Feasibility. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(37):10448-10460. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b02472.

13. Bartholomew TV, Siefert NS, Mauter MS. Cost Optimization of Osmotically Assisted Reverse Osmosis. Environmental Science and Technology. 2018;52(20):11813-11821. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02771.

14. Xianhui Li, Hasson D, Semiat R, Shemer H. Intermediate concentrate demineralization techniques for enhanced brackish water reverse osmosis water recovery – A review. Desalination. 2019;466:24-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2019.05.004.

15. Fengmin Du, Warsinger DM, Urmi TI, Thiel GP, Kumar A, Lienhard V JH. Sodium Hydroxide Production from Seawater Desalination Brine: Process Design and Energy Efficiency. Environmental Science and Technology. 2018;52(10):5949-5958. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01195.

16. Massons-Gassol G, Gilabert-Oriol G, Johnson J, Arrowood T. Comparing Biofouling Development in Membrane Fouling Simulators and Spiral-Wound Reverse Osmosis Elements Using River Water and Municipal Wastewater. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(40):11628-11633. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03219.

17. Kaili Zhang, Yuehong Zhao, Hongbin Cao, Hao Wen. Optimization of the Water Network with Single and Double Outlet Treatment Units. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research. 2017;56(10):2865-2871. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b04263.


Review

For citations:


Spitsov D.V., Saimullov A.V., Pervov A.G. Environmental aspects in construction. Environmental management in constructing autonomous facilities. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2021;11(4):674-689. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-4-674-689

Views: 131


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-2917 (Print)
ISSN 2500-154X (Online)