Preview

Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost

Advanced search

Modern temple in urban structure as a symbol of cultural identity and public space

https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2022-2-256-275

Abstract

In this work, based on the analysis and classification of arranging modern Austrian churches within the urban structure, an analogy with Russian churches was drawn, the development of the modern architecture of the Russian Orthodox Church in the 21st century was forecasted, the location of contemporary sacral architecture in the current urban area of Irkutsk was considered, and a trend to reestablish traditional techniques was revealed. Over 100 modern churches of Austrian cities, including Vienna, Salzburg, Graz and their suburbs, were examined and photofiled; the scientific publications of Austrian architects and art historians in this field were studied. The reforms in the Catholic Church in the 20th century that influenced the siting, style and form of religious architecture were addressed, and the dynamic transformation of sacred architecture was analysed. Contemporary and reconstructed historical sacral buildings of Irkutsk were examined and analysed. The tendencies in their development were summarised in the light of newly erected buildings and conceptual student and professional architectural designs of churches. Due to the political turmoil of 1917 in Russia, the development of the Russian Orthodox Church has been halted for 70 years. Thus, at the end of the 20th century, the sacral architecture revived in the same state it was destroyed. However, as a symbol of culture and architectural identity, public space, touristic and urban attraction, it has been slowly renovated over the past 30 years; new architectural solutions and locations in the urban space are being modernised. The studies show that any architectural style, even the conservative religious architecture, responds to the social phenomena and its emerging needs, resulting in a gradual change of its status in the urban development, as well as spatial organisation, composition, form and architectural style, through its implementers, namely architects and customers.

About the Authors

N. M. Glebova
Irkutsk National Research Technical University
Russian Federation

Natalia M. Glebova, Associate Professor of the Higher Attestation Commission, Associate Professor of the Department of Architectural Design

83 Lermontov St., 664074, Irkutsk



M. Klamer
Vienna Technical University
Austria

Michael Klamer, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Institute for Transport System Planning

11 Karlsgasse St., 1040, Vienna



References

1. Glebova NM, Klamer M. Evolution and modernism of church architecture in Vienna. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitel'stvo. Nedvizhimost' = Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2021;11(2):314-329. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-2-314-329.

2. Bäumler A. K, Zeese A. Wiener Kirchenbau nach 1945. Wien: Denkmalpflege und industriearchaclogie Technische Universitat; 2007. 139 S.

3. Achleitner F. Österreichische Architektur im 20. Jahrhundert. Band III/1. Wien 1.-12. Bezirk. Salzburg: Residenz Verlag; 2010. 331 S.

4. Achleitner F. Österreichische Architektur im 20. Jahrhundert. Band III/2. Wien 13.-18. Bezirk. Salzburg: Residenz Verlag; 1995. 256 S.

5. Achleitner F. Österreichische Architektur im 20. Jahrhundert. Band III/3. Wien 19.-23. Bezirk. Salzburg: Residenz Verlag; 2010. 500 S.

6. Vorderwinkler FR. Sakrale Kunst in Österreich. Kirchen der Stadt Wien. Band 1. Steyr: Kulturbuchverlag; 2008. 240 S.

7. Glebova NM, Klamer M. Red Vienna. 1919– 1934. Proekt Baikal. 2021;18(68):26-35. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.68.1797.

8. Makotina S. New places of worship in the capital of Buryatia Ulan-Ude. Proekt Baikal. 2014;11(41):50-54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.41.732.

9. Yurieva AV. Temple architecture: tradition and innovation. Elektronnyi nauchnyi zhurnal „Arkhont“. 2020;5(20):106-110. (In Russ.).

10. Kutsevich VV. Temple in the structure of the city. Tradition and modernity. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii = Architecture and modern information technologies. 2015;4(33):8. (In Russ.).

11. Barashkov VV. Aesthetical traditions and innovations in the modern christian church architecture in Western Europe. Izvestiya Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya „Politologiya. Religiovedenie“. 2018;23:137-145. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.26516/2073-3380.2018.23.137.

12. Barashkov VV. Modern church architecture as an international space of aesthetic and moral communication. Kontsept: filosofiya, religiya, kul'tura = Concept: philosophy, religion, culture. 2020;4(3):149-157. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24833/2541-8831-2020-3-15-149-157.

13. Glebova NM, Bolshakov AG. Principles of the preservation and formation of the architectural identity in street construction in the historical part of Irkutsk. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitel'stvo. Nedvizhimost' = Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2019;9(3):606-619. https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2019-3-606-619.


Review

For citations:


Glebova N.M., Klamer M. Modern temple in urban structure as a symbol of cultural identity and public space. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2022;12(2):256-275. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2022-2-256-275

Views: 130


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2227-2917 (Print)
ISSN 2500-154X (Online)