The architecture of a church on Lake Sugomak in Kyshtym, Chelyabinsk region
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-3-562-573
Abstract
This work aimed to develop a schematic design of an orthodox church, based on complex prior design studies, with improved surrounding grounds. The church should meet orthodox canons and requirements of modern architecture at the level of a general layout and a single object. To achieve this goal, the following methods were used: an on-site survey using geoinformation systems of the future construction site at Lake Sugomak in Kyshtym, Chelyabinsk region; a study of regulatory documents; a comparative analysis of religious architecture in Russia and abroad to determine the canons of Orthodox architecture; selection of an optimal solution based on a multivariate design with environmental improvement and landscape gardening of the surrounding grounds. Local conditions were examined, the traffic management and climate characteristics of the territory were determined. Owing to the instruments of modern architectural science, a unique design solution of a minimalist church was elaborated, following all urban and architectural requirements. With the erection of a temple complex, which blends seamlessly into the landscape, the designed territory will acquire a compositionally complete and contemporary appearance. The architectural solution presented can be used in designing Orthodox temples in other regions of Russia, as well as in nearand far-abroad countries.
About the Authors
S. G. ShabievRussian Federation
Salavat G. Shabiev, Doctor of Architecture, Professor, Head of the Department of Architecture
76 Lenina St., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia
V. A. Kvach
Russian Federation
Vitaly A. Kvach, Assistant professor of the Department of Architecture
76 Lenina St., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia
Ya. M. Kobylova
Russian Federation
Yana M. Kobylova, Bachelor of Architecture
76 Lenina St., Chelyabinsk, 454080, Russia
References
1. Jubilee Council of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox Church. Materials. Moscow: Publishing Council of the Moscow Patriarchate; 2001. p. 38-41. (In Russ.).
2. Makotina SA. Development and exploitation of exhibitional and post-exhibitional areas of the world universal exposition in Chicago in 1893 (the USA). Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost' = Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2014;1(6):125-139. (In Russ.).
3. Orthodox churches of the Chelyabinsk region: history and architecture. Chelyabinsk: Auto Graf; 2008. p. 256-267. (In Russ.).
4. Minakov SA. Temples of Russia. Moscow: EKSMO; 2010. p. 764-771. (In Russ.).
5. Verkhovykh EYu. Canon in the architecture of an Orthodox church. Akademicheskii vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2010;4:20-27. (In Russ.).
6. Shultz AS. Ecological approaches in sustainable urban planning. AMIT. 2021. № 1 (54). p. 227–235. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.24412/1998-4839-2021-1-227-235.
7. Ilmuratova IL, Agranovich VA. The space of an Orthodox church: history and modernity. Akademicheskii vestnik UralNIIproekt RAASN. 2010;4:44-50. (In Russ.).
8. Shevtsova TI. Orthodox iconostasis. Origin, types, spiritual meaning. Moscow: OLMA; 2003. p. 4-31. (In Russ.).
9. Zalesov VG. Architect Ernest Gibert and his alternative project of Tomsk state university. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturnostroitel'nogo universiteta. 2016;6(59):109-118. (In Russ.).
10. Shabiev SG. The architectural and artistic image of the chapel of the Holy Apostle Andrew the First-Called. Nauka YuUrGU: materialy 63-i nauchnoi konferentsii. Sektsiya tekhnicheskikh nauk (Chelyabinsk, 10–13 April 2011). Chelyabinsk: SURGU, 2011. p. 83-85. (In Russ.).
11. Shabiev SG. The architectural and compositional concept of the chapel of St. Andrew the First-Called in the city of Chelyabinsk. Voprosy planirovki i zastroiki gorodov: Materialy 18 mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii. Penza: PGUAS; 2011. p. 130-131. (In Russ.).
12. Pomorov SB. University chapel in the name of St. Tatiana, students. Arkhitektura. Gradostroitel'stvo. Dizain: Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii (Barnaul, 25–26 May 2005). Barnaul, 2005. p. 77-78. (In Russ.).
13. Antipin NA. Urbanization and public health: an ecological aspect. Zdorov'e – osnova chelovecheskogo potentsiala: problemy i puti ikh resheniya. 2010;5(1):137-142. (In Russ.).
14. Akimova MI, Salnikov EM. Architectural typology of chapels. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. 2018;20(4):9-19. http://doi.org/10.31675/1607-1859-2018-20-4-9-19. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Shabiev S.G., Kvach V.A., Kobylova Ya.M. The architecture of a church on Lake Sugomak in Kyshtym, Chelyabinsk region. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2021;11(3):562-573. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2021-3-562-573