Assessing the impact of the unfinished part of the Cascade architectural and monumental complex as a communicative core between Kentron and Kanaker-Zeytun districts in Yerevan and a proposal for solving the urban planning problem
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2024-3-629-645
EDN: BUVLXX
Abstract
The paper considers the problem of communication between Kentron and Kanaker-Zeytun districts in Yerevan. Particular attention is paid to the Cascade architectural and monumental complex. It obtains an important urban planning significance in the structure of public spaces in Yerevan and is considered by citizens as one of main symbols of the capital of Armenia. The study is aimed at identifying the grounds for poor pedestrian communication between the districts of the city and determining the prospects of development, transformation, and modernization of the territory. The methodology involved a comparative analysis of public spaces in the city center, publicly available GPS tracks and the results of a sociological survey. The results of the urban planning analysis outline the problem of pedestrian accessibility in the city, and demonstrate the relationship between public spaces. The sociological survey depicts the demands of the citizens and guests of Yerevan for the further development of the Cascade architectural and monumental complex. Studying the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of public spaces revealed the problems of communication between the districts of the city on the northsouth compositional axis, which are associated with the incomplete construction of the fifth terrace of the complex. Sociological research necessitates the construction to be completed. The survey shows the opinions of citizens and guests of the city about the potential development of the Cascade environment.
About the Authors
I. E. DruzhininaRussian Federation
Inna E. Druzhinina, Professor of the Department of Architectural Design
Author ID: 728329
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664074
R. A. Selivanov
Russian Federation
Roman A. Selivanov, Cand. of Architecture, Associate Professor of the Department of Architectural Design
Author ID:812068
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664074
G. G. Shaginyan
Russian Federation
Grach G. Shaginyan, Student
Author ID: 1195265
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk, 664074
References
1. Oganyan A.A., Azatyan K.R. Perspectives of Reconstruction of the Residential Quarters in The Centre of Yerevan City. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2020;1(50):225-237. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.24411/1998-4839-2020-15014. EDN: BNLUCP.
2. Ivanov A.V. Vernacular as Anti-Empire: Culture 3. Project Baikal. 2022;19(74):58-71. (In Russ).https://doi.org/10.51461/pb.74.13. EDN: LLMLUF.
3. Tsaidler E. Multifunctional Architecture. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1988. 151 p. (In Russ).
4. Bagina E.Yu., Arustamyan M.A. Yerevan 1924: Master Plan. Project Baikal. 2020;17(65):172-180. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.51461/projectbaikal.65.1704. EDN: TWYQYP.
5. Episkoposyan Sh. Semiotic Organization and Transformation of the Urban Space of the Center of Yerevan. In: Gorod, migratsiya, rynok: Novyi vzglyad na sotsiokul'turnye problemy v issledovaniyakh uchenykh Yuzhnogo Kavkaza = City, Migration, Market: A New Look at Sociocultural Problems in The Research of Scientists of the South Caucasus. Tbilisi; 2011. p. 13–47. (In Russ).
6. Klochko A.R. Preservation of Singularity of the National Armenian Architecture from 1919 to 2019 – from A. Tamanyan to Present Days. Architecture and Modern Information Technologies. 2019;4(49):108-119. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.24411/1998-4839-2019-00009. EDN: CJDOZQ.
7. Arutyunyan M.V. Development of Architecture of the Republic of Armenia. Polish Journal of Science. 2023;61(61):4-12. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7835005. EDN: NBSQHZ.
8. Bal'yan K.V. City Looking Towards Ararat. Project Classic. 2006. Available from: http://www.projectclassica.ru/school/18_2006/school2006_18_03a.htm [Accessed 06 December 2023]. (In Russ.).
9. Geil Ya. Cities for People. Moscow: Alpina Publisher, 2012. 277 p. (In Russ.).
10. Chan A.D., Gavrilov A.G., Babenko A.G. Positive Aspects of Using Transformable Structures in The Formation of Public Spaces. In: Novye idei novogo veka: materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii FAD TOGU = New Ideas of the New Century: Materials of The International Scientific Conference FAD TOGU. 2022: Vol. 1. p. 481–484. (In Russ.). EDN: ZEIRGA.
11. Fink D., Selivanov R.A. Context Effect On the Form Making of Modern Development. Contours of A Problem. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2017;7(3):156-167. (In Russ.). EDN: ZHZEEJ.
12. Mamyan T.A. Social Aspects of the Development and Formation of an Adaptive Environment for Systems of Public Spaces. In: Smotr-konkurs nauchnykh, konstruktorskikh i tekhnologicheskikh rabot studentov Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta: tezisy dokladov. V 2-kh chastyakh = Review-Competition of Scientific, Design and Technological Works of Students of the Volgograd State Technical University: Abstracts of Reports. In 2 Parts. 16–19 May 2017, Volgograd. Volgograd; 2017. P. 2. p. 111–112. (In Russ.). EDN: ZALJHH.
13. Polyakov D.K., Pupentsova S.V., Nekrasova T.P. World and Domestic Experience in Redevelopment of Territories. Issues of Social-Economic Development of Siberia. 2018;4(34):67-75. (In Russ.). EDN: YUDHBR.
14. Arustamyan M.A. Preservation of The Historical Structure and Exclusion of Conflict Zones at Reconstruction of Konda in Yerevan. Architecton: Proceedings of Higher Education. 2022;3(79):1-10. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.47055/1990-4126-2022-3(79)-9. EDN: WGKEAK.
15. Gel'fond A.L. Methods for Organizing Public Spaces of a Historical Settlement. In: Trudy nauchnogo kongressa 13-go rossiiskogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo foruma = Proceedings of The Scientific Congress of The 13th Russian Architectural and Construction Forum. 19–22 May 2015, Nizhny Novgorod. Nizhny Novgorod; 2016. p. 13–17. (In Russ.). EDN: WBHNBF.
16. Selivanov R.A., Bolshakov A.G. Modeling of The Architectural Space in The Context of the Blocks of the Historic Center. Baladinskie chteniya. 2018;13(1):83-88. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24411/9999-001A-2018-10012. EDN: YMJIQX.
17. Ter-Minasyan A. Architect by Vocation. In Memory of Jim Torosyan. Architecture, Construction, Design. 2014;3(76):88-93. (In Russ.). EDN: SUCEJL.
18. Teodoronsky V.S., Leonova V.A., Vardanyan K.K. Historically Formed Structure of the Gardening System Inthe Center of Yerevan and Its Modern Problems. Landscape Architecture in The Globalization Era. 2020;4:5-19. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37770/2712-7656-2020-4-5-19. EDN: ITLNYJ.
19. Balyan K. Armenian Architecture in Search of Its Indigenous Form. Project Baikal. 2020;17(64):52-63. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7480/projectbaikal.64.1634. EDN: IPBWCE.
20. Amirkhanian T.A. Yerevan Cascade. Urban Planning Role, History and Perspective. In: Bol'shaya studencheskaya konferentsiya. Sbornik statei V Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii v 2 chastyakh = Large Student Conference. Collection of Articles of the V International Scientific and Practical Conference in 2 Parts. 05 May 2023, Penza. Penza; 2023. P. 1. p. 239–243. (In Russ.). EDN: UVTPDU.
21. Melkumyan Yu.G. Visual Communications: The Role of Monuments in The Urban Environment of Yerevan. In: Korporativnye strategicheskie kommunikatsii: trendy v professional'noi deyatel'nosti: materialy Tret'ei Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii = Corporate Strategic Communications: Trends in Professional Activities: Materials of The Third International Scientific and Practical Conference. 08–09 October 2020, Minsk. Minsk; 2020. p. 170–178. (In Russ.). EDN: KKAHOL.
22. Valetov T.Ya. Free Map Services (Google, Yandex, Osm) For Creating Historical Gis: Digital Map of the Trans-Siberian Railroad. Historical Information Science. 2021;3(37):19-37. (In Russ.)https://doi.org/10.7256/2585-7797.2021.3.36547. EDN: CHPMUQ.
23. Andreenkova A.V. Comparative Social Research as A Special Type of Social Research. Sociodynamics. 2019;11:105-111. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7144.2019.11.31024. EDN: RPCENC.
24. Nikitina A.D. Review of Foreign Experience in Renovation of Public Spaces in The Historical Part of the City. Nauchnye vesti. 2022;11(52):80-87. (In Russ.). EDN: FOUANO.
25. Vermishyan H., Michikyan S. The Transformation of Urban Public Space of Post-Soviet Yerevan: The Case of Northern Avenue. Journal of Sociology: Bulletin of Yerevan University. 2020;11(1):3-15. https://doi.org/10.46991/BYSU:F/2020.11.1.003. EDN: OXBZFM.
26. Grigorian T.V. Features of Architecture and Yerevan Historical and Cultural Life. In: World Science: Problems and Innovations: sbornik statei XVII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: v 3 chastyakh = World Science: Problems and Innovations: Collection of Articles of The XVII International Scientific and Practical Conference: In 3 Parts. 30 January 2018, Penza. Penza; 2018. P. 1. p. 243–250. (In Russ.). EDN: YRJHKA.
27. Kazaryan A.Yu. The Architectural Idea of the People's House at Yerevan. Reflections On Artistic Method of Alexander Tamanyan. Voprosy teatra. 2014;1-2:267-279. (In Russ.). EDN: TMWMOF.
28. Harutyun V., Lilit B. Yerevan Center Urban Parks and Garden Squares: Places for People, Places of Meanings. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2022;1(2):157-184. https://doi.org/10.34680/urbis-2022-1(2)-157-184. EDN: ELLNND.
29. Tonnelat S. The Sociology of Urban Public Spaces. In: Territorial Evolution and Planning Solution: Experiences from China and France. Paris: Atlantis Press, 2010. p. 1-10.
30. Vermishyan A.R., Balasanyan S.A., Grigoryan O.G., Kerobyan S.N. Local Identities in Yerevan: Structures of Urban Space. Yerevan: Yerevan State University, 2015. p. 108–109. (In Russ.).
31. Nurlankyzy Zh. Interactive Map, Consideration of The Spatial Characteristics of Objects. Aktual'nye nauchnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire. 2019;5-1:93-95. (In Russ.). EDN: TBSMOB.
32. Shevchenko V.E. Visual Communication: The Trends of Forms and Technology of Information Transferring. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2015;5(360):189-195. (In Russ.). EDN: TQSSWV.
33. Amirkhanian T.A. Decoration of The Architectural Complex «Cascade» In Yerevan. In: Aktual'nye nauchnye issledovaniya: sbornik statei XII Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii: v 4 chastyakh = Current Scientific Research: Collection of Articles of The XII International Scientific and Practical Conference: In 4 Parts. 05 June 2023, Penza. Penza; 2023. P. 1, p. 216–221. (In Russ.). EDN: BGBQSQ.
34. Korableva G.B., Merenkova A.V. Social Space of a Modern City. Ekaterinburg: Ural University, 2015. p. 83. (In Russ.).
35. Fink D., Selivanov R.A. Estimation Criteria of Tactfulness to Enter the Context. Proceedings of Universities. Investment. Construction. Real estate. 2018;8(1):222-232. (In Russ.). EDN: YUVVPA.
36. Samoylova N.V. Socio-Demographic Aspects of the Organization of Public Spaces of Urban Parks. Engineering Journal of Don. 2019;1(52):1-13. (In Russ.). EDN: YLQAAW.
37. Gutnov A.E. The Evolution of Urban Planning. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1984. 256 p. (In Russ.).
38. Selivanov R.A. The Song or Arpentage? In The Spatial Context of the Quarters of the Historical Center of Irkutsk. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Sciencethis. 2021;751(1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/751/1/012056.
39. Bol'shakov A.G., Sel'vi A.A.S. Social Factors and Architecture of the Old City of Sana'a, Their Transformation and The Principle of Continuity in The Space of the New Sana'a: Monograph. Belgorod: Belgorod State University, 2014. 159 p. (In Russ.). EDN: TSFMWN.
40. Arakelyan R.G. Disclosure of The Values of Volumetric-Spatial Characteristics of Traditional Residential Formations On the Territory of the Armenian Highlands. Moscow Architectural Institute. State Academy. 2011;3(16):1-23. Available from: http://www.marhi.ru/AMIT/2011/3kvart11/arakelyan/abstract1.php [Accessed 12th December 2023]. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Druzhinina I.E., Selivanov R.A., Shaginyan G.G. Assessing the impact of the unfinished part of the Cascade architectural and monumental complex as a communicative core between Kentron and Kanaker-Zeytun districts in Yerevan and a proposal for solving the urban planning problem. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2024;14(3):629-645. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2024-3-629-645. EDN: BUVLXX