Criteria of the quality system of design organizations: modular approach taking into account risks
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2025-3-516-525
EDN: YQQYKF
Abstract
The purpose of the research is to develop criteria for the quality system of a design organization using modular and risk-based approaches. The modular approach makes it possible to evaluate various aspects of the project organization's activities, deconstructing them into separate modules based on the organizational and technical model of functioning. Modules of human resources, engineering and technical support and evaluation of the quality of project products are proposed. In each module, criteria with certain weight coefficients are evaluated. The quantitative indicators of the criteria are determined by an expert method, and the assignment of weighting coefficients is based on the multi-criteria hierarchy analysis (AHP) method. Using the personnel potential module as an example, the compilation of a matrix of paired comparisons and calculations of its consistency indices are shown. The risk-based approach classifies project organizations into three levels, depending on a comprehensive assessment in three modules. The numerical values of the factors obtained make it possible to make a ranking according to the degree of significance, and based on this, to develop corrective measures aimed at improving the problematic areas of the project organization. The systematized list of criteria introduces a comprehensive indicator of the enterprise's quality system, which can serve as an indicator of designers' readiness to perform various levels of contracts, taking into account possible error risks. The results of the testing showed that a modular approach to quality management allows not only to increase the efficiency of the design organization, but also to reduce the risks associated with design and construction errors.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Samarin
Apriori-Stroy LLC
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexandr Yu. Samarin, General Director
224 Rossiyskaya St., Chelyabinsk, 454091
Author ID: 1261518
A. Kh. Baiburin
South Ural State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Albert Kh. Baiburin, Dr. Sci. (Eng.), Professor of the Department of Building Technologies and Structural Engineering
Lenin Ave. 76, Chelyabinsk, 454080
Author ID: 266980
References
1. Baiburin A.Kh., Stoyakin I.V. Accidents of Buildings and Structures (Lessons From Construction Accidents). Chelyabinsk: Tsitsero, 2019. 124 p. (In Russ.).
2. Baiburin A.Kh. Ensuring The Quality and Safety of Erected Civil Buildings. Moscow: ASV Publishing House, 2015. 336 p. (In Russ.).
3. Lapina A.P., Ponomarenko A.V., Shentsova K.V., Kotesova A.A. Analysis of the Causes of Accidents at Different Stages of Life Cycle of The Construction Object. Stroitelnye materialy i izdeliya. 2019;2(2):17-22. (In Russ.). EDN: WRKZYE.
4. Perelmuter A.V. Selected Problems of Reliability and Safety of Building Structures. Moscow: ASV Publishing House, 2007. 256 p. (In Russ.).
5. Akristiniy V.A., Zharkov D.A. Analysis of Implemented Methods of Construction and Technical Expertise of Project Documentation. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Technology Integral. 2019;4-2:1-16. (In Russ.). EDN: XKLZBS.
6. Samofalov M., Papinigis V. Quality of Design Documentation from the Point of View of Technical Expertise in Lithuania. Magazine of Civil Engineering. 2010;2:4-11. (In Russ.). EDN: LRPZYQ.
7. Yijie Wang, Linzao Hou, Mian Li, Ruixiang Zheng A Novel Fire Risk Assessment Approach for LargeScale Commercial and High-Rise Buildings Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Coupling Revision. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(13):1-30. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137187.
8. Tabejamaat S., Ahmadi H., Barmayehvar B. Boosting Large-Scale Construction Project Risk Management: Application of the Impact of Building Information Modeling, Knowledge Management, and Sustainable Practices for Optimal Productivity. Energy Science & Engineering. 2024;12(5):2284-2296. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.1746.
9. Rachmadhani M.M., Immawan T., Mansur A., Choi W. Risk Management Framework Design Based on ISO 31000 and SCOR Model. Spektrum Industri. 2023;21(1):41-51. https://doi.org/10.12928/si.v21i1.93.
10. Azgaldov G.G. Qualimetry in Architectural and Construction Design. Moscow: Stroyizdat, 1989. 272 p. (In Russ.).
11. Theilig K., Lourenço B., Reitberger R., Lang W. Life Cycle Assessment and Multi-Criteria DecisionMaking for Sustainable Building Parts: Criteria, Methods, and Application. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2024;29:1965-1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-024-02331-9.
12. Selleck R., Hassall M., Cattani M. Determining the Reliability of Critical Controls in Construction Projects. Safety. 2022;8(3):1-23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.3390/safety8030064.
13. Saati T. Decision Making. Hierarchy Process Analysis. Moscow: Radio and Communications, 1993. 278 p. (In Russ.).
14. Golubova O.S. Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Design and Estimate Documentation in Construction. In: Aktualnye voprosy ekonomiki stroitel'stva i gorodskogo khozyaistva: doklady mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii = Current Issues in Construction Economics and Urban Management: Reports of The International Scientific and Practical Conference. 13–14 May 2014, Minsk. Minsk; 2014. p. 55–65. (In Russ.).
15. Aliulova V.A., Petrochenko M.V. The Quality Assessment of Reusable Project Documentation. Monthly Journal on Construction and Architecture. 2021;16(6):730-740. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.22227/1997-0935.2021.6.730-740. EDN: WGMNRP.
16. Sborshikov S.S., Bahus E.E. Multifactorial Parametric Model of Efficiency of Organizational Solutions for Ensuring the Construction Quality. Industrial and Civil Engineering. 2018;12:60-67. (In Russ.). EDN: YTWAAX.
17. Tuhacek M., Svoboda P. Quality of Project Documentation. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2019;471(5):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/5/052012.
18. Likholetov V.V. Significance of Error Theories for Engineering and Development of Domestic Engineering Education. Inzhenernoe obrazovanie. 2024;35:158-180. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54835/18102883_2024_35_15. EDN: ARJPOF.
19. Mingke Zhou, Yuegang Tang, Huai Jin, Bo Zhang, Xuewen Sang A BIM-Based Identification and Classification Method of Environmental Risks in the Design of Beijing Subway. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2021;27(7):500-514. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.15602.
20. Seoung-Wook Whang, Sohrab Donyavi, Roger Flanagan, Sangyong Kim Contractor-Led Design Risk Management in International Large Project: Korean Contractor’s Perspective. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. 2023;22(3):1387-1398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2085718.
Review
For citations:
Samarin A.Yu., Baiburin A.Kh. Criteria of the quality system of design organizations: modular approach taking into account risks. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2025;15(3):516-525. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2025-3-516-525. EDN: YQQYKF
Views:
26
Email this article 