Spatial integration of site development of Irkutsk historical centre
https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2023-1-151-167
Abstract
The aim was to investigate the integrity of the urban fabric of Irkutsk historical centre regarding interaction between urban morphotypes and their functional use in conjunction with orientation around the city. The study considered theoretical background to the analysis of integration of the historic city development, including the local approaches to working with places of interest. Two fundamentally different approaches were identified. The first approach addresses the issues of organizing the spatial structure and generating the geometry. The second approach examines the socio-functional issues of the environment, its cognitive psychological aspects. Local approaches to working with places of interest focus on dividing the city into environment protection zones and subzones, each of which corresponds to its own type of reconstruction, regeneration and transformation. Here, the conventional approaches to city protection zoning and zone regulation are supplemented by a new approach to the topological regulation of site development. The evolution stages in the development of the place of interest in the centre of Irkutsk were revealed. The research involved a chronological analysis of publications of Irkutsk authors on the development of “place” as a historical area of the city, starting from the period of its initial development (the second half of the 17th century) to the beginning of the 21st century. The content of the stages is a new feature in the context of site development. The research revealed evolution of site development of Irkutsk from the middle of the 17th century to the 2000s, as well as approaches to arranging the territories adjacent to buildings among themselves.
About the Authors
R. A. SelivanovRussian Federation
Roman A. Selivanov - Associate Professor of the Department of Architectural Design.
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664074
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article
A. G. Bolshakov
Russian Federation
Andrey G. Bolshakov - Doctor of Architecture, Professor, Head of the Department of Architectural Design.
83 Lermontov St., Irkutsk 664074
Competing Interests:
The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article
References
1. Bolshakov A.G. The culture of spatial lattices in urban planning and architecture. Irkutsk: Irkutsk national research technical university; 2021. 260 p. (In Russ.).
2. Krasheninnikov A.V. Cognitive urbanism: archetypes and prototypes of the urban environment. Moscow: KURS; 2020. 210 p. (In Russ.).
3. Krasheninnikov A.V. Meso-spaces of the urban environment. Arkhitektura i sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii = Architecture and modern information technologies. 2015;4:4. (In Russ.).
4. Krasheninnikov A.V. Approbation of environmental behavior diagram. Nauka, obrazovanie i eksperimental'noe proektirovanie: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii = Science, education and experimental design: Proceedings of Int. scientific-practical conferences. 8– 12 April 2013. Moscow: Moscow institute of architecture; 2013. p. 264-268. (In Russ.).
5. Hiller B., Hanson J. The social logic of space. UCL: Cambridge University Press; 1984. 275 p.
6. Bolshakov A.G. Evaluation of building morphotypes as a reflection of the interests and values of the urban community and their balance as a principle of urban regeneration of the historical center. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Proceedings of Irkutsk State Technical University. 2012;9:89-97. (In Russ.).
7. Monastyrskaya M.E. “Reslobalization” of cities as an effective responseto the epidemiological challenge of the contemporary. Part I: general provisions, research hypothesis. Gradostroitel'stvo i arkhitektura = Urban construction and architecture. 2021;11(1):110-117. https://doi.org/10.17673/Vestnik.2021.01.15.
8. Monastyrskaya M.E. “Reslobodization” of cities as an effective responseto the epidemiological chal lenge of the contemporary. Part II: preconditions, algorithms, results. Gradostroitel'stvo i arkhitektura = Urban construction and architecture. 2021;11(2):117-129. https://doi.org/10.17673/Vestnik.2021.02.17.
9. Fridman I. Scientific methods in architecture. Translated from English A.A. Voronova. Moscow: Stroiizdat; 1983. 160 p. (In Russ.). Fridman Y. Toward a Scientific Architecture. 1975.
10. Aleksandrov A.D. Abstract spaces. Matematika, ee soderzhanie, metody i znachenie = Mathematics, its content, methods and meaning. 1956;(3):158. (In Russ.).
11. Bol'shakov A.G. Urban landscapes of the historical center of Irkutsk: principles of reconstruction. Proekt Baikal = Project Baikal. 2009:20;140-144. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Selivanov R.A., Bolshakov A.G. Spatial integration of site development of Irkutsk historical centre. Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsii. Stroitelstvo. Nedvizhimost. 2023;13(1):151-167. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2023-1-151-167